High court rejects GOP bid in Ohio voting dispute
Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on October 18, 2008 at 08:27 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) – “The Supreme Court sided Friday with Ohio’s top elections official in a dispute with the state Republican Party over voter registrations.
The justices overruled a federal appeals court that had ordered Ohio’s top elections official to do more to help counties verify voter eligibility.”
Assuming Ohio is 1 of the 2 states to decide this election, this event plus the status of the stock market has pretty much locked Obama in as President.
Americans have right to guns under landmark ruling
Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on June 26, 2008 at 04:49 PM
In case you haven’t heard….
“Individual Americans have a right to own guns, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday for the first time in the country’s history, striking down a strict gun control law in the U.S. capital.
The landmark 5-4 ruling marked the first time in nearly 70 years the high court has addressed the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It rejected the argument the right to keep and bear arms was tied to service in a state militia.”
LINK to article.
Justices Agree on Right to Own Guns
Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on March 18, 2008 at 09:17 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) – Americans have a right to own guns, Supreme Court justices declared Tuesday in a historic and lively debate that could lead to the most significant interpretation of the Second Amendment since its ratification two centuries ago.
This is great news! Ose will never support the Second Amendment, just look at his backers…Dan “the gun grabber” Lungren?? This is why you HAVE to vote for Tom McClintock in June!
Not too late...
Posted by Ben Mavy on February 06, 2008 at 10:52 AM
Good grief what has happened to our party? Any student of history will recognize the value of the two party system; this primary race demonstrates that the system is only a safe-guard and not a solution. The safeguard has likely failed us, leaving our country with the worst two candidates in the history of our nation.
We can still hold out hope that the remaining states realize McCain is an unacceptable candidate. This is not likely, but consider the delegate math. McCain needs roughly 37% of the remaining un-pledged delegates, this includes non-committed delegates from states that have already held their primaries. That’s a bigger chunk of the vote than he’s been getting in most contested states. We still have time for voters to wake up to the threat of a McCain candidacy. There is little hope for Romney or Huckabee to wrap up the vote prior to the convention, but it isn’t too late to take out McCain.
Should McCain win the nomination what is a principled conservative to do? McCain is a much bigger threat to conservatism than any liberal Democrat, but is it ethical to vote for somebody that is still an enemy to what you believe? Some conservative talking heads preach that we need to vote for McCain for no other reason than the courts, which only raises more concerns with McCain. I predict that should we be so unfortunate to see McCain elected, he will lecture us on why we need justices with moderate political views that believe the constitution is a living document.
The one compelling reason I’ve heard for voting for McCain is his age. If he were to bring on a true conservative as VP, we could hope his current diet of donuts and more donuts would relieve us of his leadership in short time. I’m predicting moderate Republican Governor Charlie Christ of Florida will be the VP nominee, so this won’t be an issue.
One last thought:
Placer County has a reputation of being a conservative area, but if we look at returns for the last few elections, this area is not actually very conservative. For example: in 2006 only 53% of Placer County voters supported parents having the right to know when a school takes their 12 year old daughter to have an abortion, Placer County’s only supervisor with a reputation of being conservative has endorsed a liberal candidate for congress, and yesterday McCain won here.
Perhaps the leftists in our party are correct: If the Republican Party is to remain viable, we need to accept the liberal ideas of the democrats and abandon the principles of Ronald Reagan.
Is McCain an Acceptable Candidate?
Posted by Ben Mavy on January 09, 2008 at 02:26 PM
The number one issue for Republicans in this race should be judges, based on John McCain’s past and current positions Republicans CANNOT trust him:
Global Warming, Affirmative Action, the International Criminal Court, Guantanomo, Tax-cuts, McCain-Feingold, the Gang of 14, Amnesty(or Z-Visa if you don’t like that word), Christian leaders are “agents of intolerance”. McCain has not admitted to being wrong on any of these issues, with the exception of an apology to Christians for attacking Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson as “agents of intolerance.” I’m sure the apology was as sincere as any of his other straight talk.
As a person who believes in repentance and forgiveness I should comment on why these issues prevent me from EVER supporting John McCain. I believe that a man can repent and be forgiven, but that doesn’t exempt him from facing consequences.
I will not vote for someone who has cheated on their wife, period. McCain cheated on his wife with a beautiful 25 year old with enough family money to launch his political career.
Believe what you want about his supposed straight talk. I am grateful to him for his service to our country, but I would never vote for him.
U.S. justices could decide constitutionality of gun ownership
Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on November 11, 2007 at 05:32 PM
This is VERY important folks, we need to protect our Second Amendment if we ever want to keep our other Constitutional rights!
“The question is whether the Second Amendment to the Constitution protects an individual right to ‘keep and bear arms.’”
