Please Contact the Members of the Senate Appropriations Committee Today!

Three anti-gun bills have been placed in the suspense file due to cost constraints, however they could possibly be resurrected during a special Senate Appropriations Committee hearing scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday, August 7.

Assembly Bill 2062 would require an individual to possess a license to purchase ammunition, require vendors to keep a detailed record of the transaction, and simply ban mail or internet ammunition orders.

Assembly Bill 2235 would ban the sale of handguns other than “owner-authorized (or “smart”) handguns”—that is, handguns with a permanent, programmable biometric feature that renders the firearm useless unless activated by an authorized user.

Assembly Bill 2948 would prohibit the sale of firearms and ammunition on the property or inside the buildings that comprise the Cow Palace.

Please contact the members of the Senate Appropriations Committee and respectfully urge them to oppose these anti-freedom measures. Contact information for the Senate Appropriations Committee is below.

SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:

State Senator Tom Torlakson (Chair)
Phone: (916) 651-4007
Fax: (916) 445-2527

State Senator Dave Cox (Vice Chair)
Phone: (916) 651-4001
Fax: (916) 324-2680

State Senator Samuel Aanestad
Phone: (916) 651-4004
Fax: (916) 445-7750

State Senator Roy Ashburn
Phone: (916) 651-4018
Fax: (916) 322-3304

State Senator Gilbert Cedillo
Phone: (916) 651-4022
Fax: (916) 327-8817

State Senator Ellen Corbett
Phone: (916) 651-4010
Fax: (916) 327-2433

State Senator Robert Dutton
Phone: (916) 651-4031
Fax: (916) 327-2272

State Senator Dean Florez
Phone: (916) 651-4016
Fax: (916) 327-5989

State Senator Sheila Kuehl
Phone: (916) 651-4023
Fax: (916) 324-4823
senator.kuehl@sen.ca.gov

State Senator Jenny Oropeza
Phone: (916) 651-4028
Fax: (916) 323-6056

State Senator Mark Ridley-Thomas
Phone: (916) 651-4026
Fax: (916) 445-8899

State Senator George Runner
Phone: (916) 651-4017
Fax: (916) 445-4662

State Senator Joe Simitian
Phone: (916) 651-4011
Fax: (916) 323-4529

State Senator Mark Wyland
Phone: (916) 651-4038
Fax: (916) 446-7382

State Senator Leland Yee
Phone: (916) 651-4008
Fax: (916) 327-2186

In case you haven’t heard….

“Individual Americans have a right to own guns, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday for the first time in the country’s history, striking down a strict gun control law in the U.S. capital.

The landmark 5-4 ruling marked the first time in nearly 70 years the high court has addressed the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It rejected the argument the right to keep and bear arms was tied to service in a state militia.”

LINK to article.

Earlier this week the Assembly passed Assembly Bill 2948 by a vote of 41 to 25. AB2948 seeks to ban the sale of firearms and ammunition on the property or inside the buildings that comprise the Cow Palace. The bill now heads to the Senate for its consideration. Also headed to the Senate are Assembly Bill 2235 and Assembly Bill 2062.

AB 2235 would prohibit the sale of handguns other than “owner-authorized (or “smart”) handguns”—that is, handguns with a permanent, programmable biometric feature that renders the firearm useless unless activated by the authorized user. No proven, viable handgun of this type has ever been developed. Introduced by Assemblyman Mark DeSaulnier (D-11), AB2235 would require the Attorney General to report to the Governor and Legislature on the availability of owner-authorized handguns; once the Attorney General finds that these guns are available, only “owner-authorized” handguns could be approved for sale in California.

AB 2062 would make it a crime to privately transfer more than 50 rounds of ammunition per month, even between family and friends, unless you are registered as a “handgun ammunition vendor” in the Department of Justice’s database. Ammunition retailers would have to be licensed and store ammunition in such a manner that it would be inaccessible to purchasers. The bill would also require vendors to keep a record of the transaction including the ammunition buyer’s name, driver’s license, the quantity, caliber, type of ammunition purchased, and right thumbprint, which would be submitted to the Department of Justice. All ammunition sales in the state of California would be subject to a $3 per transaction tax. Lastly, mail order ammunition sales would be prohibited. Any violator of AB2062 would be subject to civil fines. AB2062 was amended to remove the requirement that law-abiding gun owners obtain a permit to purchase handgun ammunition.

Please contact your State Senator and respectfully urge him or her to oppose AB2948, AB2235 and AB2062 when they come before them for a vote. Contact information for your State Senator can be found by clicking here.

Blooger’s Note – The response of the Ose campaign thus far has been to call Tim Macy a Racist. I guess it cuts both ways…

Press Release from McClintock Campaign Follows:

Gun Owners of America Strongly Endorses McClintock for Congress
The Gun Owners of America-Political Victory Fund has endorsed state Senator Tom McClintock in the fourth Congressional District of California.

“Senator McClintock has earned an A+ rating by Gun Owners every year that he’s been in office, and he will be a leader on Second Amendment issues when elected to the U.S. House of Representatives,” said Tim Macy, Vice Chairman of Gun Owners of America PVF. “We strongly endorse Tom McClintock.”

“On issues important to gun owners and protecting the Second Amendment rights of our citizens, Doug Ose maintained a liberal voting record in Congress,” said Stan Devereux, McClintock’s spokesman. “A liberal like Ose is completely out-of-step with this conservative district.”

Ose has received a lifetime rating of “F” from the Gun Owners of America and “D+” from the National Rifle Association.

On Tuesday, April 15, the Assembly Public Safety Committee will consider Assembly Bill 2235, a bill to forbid the sale of handguns other than “owner-authorized (or “smart”) handguns”—that is, handguns with a permanent, programmable biometric feature that renders the firearm useless unless activated by the authorized user. No proven, viable handgun of this type has ever been developed.

Introduced by Assemblyman Mark DeSaulnier (D-11), AB2235 would require the Attorney General to report to the Governor and Legislature on the availability of owner-authorized handguns; once the Attorney General finds that these guns are available, only “owner-authorized” handguns could be approved for sale in California.

The law enforcement community has even expressed concerns about the use of this technology in firearms. How often has your computer malfunctioned while simply sitting stationary on your desktop? With that in mind, are you willing to put your personal safety, and that of your loved ones, in the hands of a sensitive computer system exposed to recoil, heat, solvents, dirt and grime? For an informative article about smart guns and the New Jersey law this bill is based on, please click here.

Please contact the members of the Public Safety Committee today and respectfully urge them to oppose this ill-advised proposal. Contact information for the Committee can be found below.

State Assembly Member Jose Solorio (D-69), Chair
(916) 319-2069
Assemblymember.solorio@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Greg Aghazarian, (R-26), Vice Chair
(916) 319-2026
Assemblymember.aghazarian@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Joel Anderson (R-77)
(916) 319-2077
Assemblymember.Anderson@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Hector De La Torre (D-50)
(916) 319-2050
Assemblymember.DeLaTorre@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Fiona Ma (D-12)
(916) 319-2012
Assemblymember.Ma@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Anthony J. Portantino (D-44)
(916) 319-2044
Assemblymember.Portantino@assembly.ca.gov

Yesterday, Tuesday, April 8, the Assembly Public Safety Committee passed Assembly Bill 2948, sponsored by State Assembly Member Mark Leno (D-13). AB2948 would ban the sale of firearms and ammunition on the property or inside the buildings that comprise the Cow Palace.

While AB2948 passed the Public Safety Committee, another anti-gun bill, Assembly Bill 2566, introduced by State Assembly Member Loni Hancock (D-14), failed to pass after several votes. AB2566 would have repealed statewide preemption statutes and allowed cities, counties, and other such localities to enact their own forms of restrictive regulation on handguns. Uniform laws regulating firearms and ammunition are necessary to protect the constitutional rights of California’s law-abiding gun owners and to prevent anti-gun municipalities from passing their own laws, which may conflict with state law.

Please continue contacting your State Assembly Member and respectfully urge him or her to oppose AB2948 and AB2566.

PLEASE CONTACT THIS BLOG IF YOU DON’T KNOW WHO YOUR REPRESENTATIVE IS!!!!

OPPOSE AB2062

On Tuesday, April 8, the Assembly Public Safety Committee will consider legislation that would require gun owners to obtain a “permit-to-purchase” before buying handgun ammunition.

Introduced by State Assembly Member Kevin De Leon (D-45), Assembly Bill 2062 puts ammunition sales in the crosshairs. AB2062 would require that law-abiding gun owners obtain a permit to buy handgun ammunition and would impose severe restrictions on the private transfers of handgun ammunition. Applicants for a “permit-to-purchase” would be required to submit to a background check, pay a $35 fee, and wait as long as 30 days to receive the permit.

Under AB2062, it would be unlawful to privately transfer more than 50 rounds of ammunition per month, even between family and friends, unless you are registered as a “handgun ammunition vendor” in the Department of Justice’s database. Ammunition retailers would have to be licensed and store ammunition in such a manner that it would be inaccessible to purchasers. The bill would also require vendors to keep a record of the transaction including the ammunition buyer’s name, driver’s license, the quantity, caliber and type of ammunition purchased, and right thumbprint, which would be submitted to the Department of Justice or the number of his handgun ammunition purchase permit. Vendors would be required to contact the purchase permit database, to verify the validity of a permit before completing a sale. All ammunition sales in the State of California would be subject to a $3 per transaction tax. Lastly, mail order ammunition sales would be prohibited. Any violator of AB2062 would be subject to civil fines.

Please contact the members of the Assembly Public Safety Committee and your State Assembly Member TODAY and respectfully urge them to oppose this onerous attack on our Second Amendment freedoms. Contact information for the committee members can be found below. Please click here to find your State Assembly Member.

State Assembly Member Jose Solorio (D-69), Chair
(916) 319-2069
Assemblymember.solorio@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Greg Aghazarian, (R-26), Vice Chair
(916) 319-2026
Assemblymember.aghazarian@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Joel Anderson (R-77)
(916) 319-2077
Assemblymember.Anderson@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Hector De La Torre (D-50)
(916) 319-2050
Assemblymember.DeLaTorre@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Fiona Ma (D-12)
(916) 319-2012
Assemblymember.Ma@assembly.ca.gov

State Assembly Member Anthony J. Portantino (D-44)
(916) 319-2044
Assemblymember.Portantino@assembly.ca.gov

Contact these people today!

“Need more confirmation that a majority of Americans support the Right to Keep and Bear Arms? Look no further than the results of a Gallup poll, which were reported in a March 27, Gallup.com article. The poll found that an overwhelming majority of the United States public—73%—believes that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of Americans to own firearms.

Other recent polls have shown that Americans support gun rights. A Zogby International poll for Associated Television News, conducted December 13-17, 2007 found 27% of voters would be more likely to support a candidate endorsed by NRA (through its PAC, NRA Political Victory Fund). That survey showed that NRA ranks above Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, the AFL-CIO, Oprah Winfrey, and Barbara Streisand in influencing voters! And another Zogby International poll conducted earlier in 2007 found that 66% of the American voting public rejects the idea that new gun control laws are needed.”

LINK

NAS Says Ballistic Imaging Database “Should Not Be Established”

The good news for gun owners is that a highly regarded committee of experts, including some who are known supporters of gun control, have concluded as NRA has been saying all along that an image database is not necessarily capable of the crime-solving solutions its advocates have long claimed. LINK

Outrage Of The Week—Political Hypocrisy By Obama

A March 2 commentary in National Review Online (NRO) demonstrates the hypocrisy that often abounds in the campaigns of anti-Second Amendment candidates. This time, the transgressor is Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama. LINK

Reposted with permission from the NRA

WASHINGTON (AP) – Americans have a right to own guns, Supreme Court justices declared Tuesday in a historic and lively debate that could lead to the most significant interpretation of the Second Amendment since its ratification two centuries ago.

LINK

This is great news! Ose will never support the Second Amendment, just look at his backers…Dan “the gun grabber” Lungren?? This is why you HAVE to vote for Tom McClintock in June!

I can’t make this stuff up – let’s lead off with 1380 KTKZ Capitol Hour clip number two… Doug Ose boldly proclaims that he is Pro-Gun!

Lie Number Two: I’m the only guy who did anything to protect your right to keep and bear arms!

Doug Ose on his ‘support’ of the 2nd Amendment:

Javascript and Flash must be enabled and installed to play this audio file.

This first thing that jumps out at me is that Ose highlights his support of a bill making it more difficult to purchase ANY ammo, not just the types he highlights in his comments.

We have harped for weeks about Ose getting a D+ from the NRA and an “F” from Gun Owners of America. You don’t get those scores from a couple bad votes. You get those scores from an open record of hostility to the 2nd ammendment.

Ose also takes another cheap shot at Tom McClintock and Rico Oller – stating that they have done nothing at the state level to stop “infringement after infringement”. Because of groups like the MainStreet Partnership that spend their money attacking Conservatives instead of Democrats – Ose is helping to ensure that Republican State Senators stay in the minority.

Gun Owner’s of America wrote the following on their blog that I picked up here a few weeks ago that further shows Ose’s statements to be a bald-faced lie: (excerpt – note this was written in the context of Rico Oller vs Doug Ose)

Point three. Rico has a primary opponent in former liberal Republican Congressman Doug Ose. During Ose’s six years in Congress, he earned a GOA “F” on every single one of our ratings for house members.

Ose voted IN FAVOR of keeping the Washington D.C. gun ban. He voted to outlaw individual sales at gun shows. He voted for mandatory sale of trigger locks for any handgun sold. He voted to silence outside groups like GOA at election time.

Doug Ose probably has his picture framed and hanging on the wall at Handgun Control Inc. (now the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence), since he was one of their best friends in Congress.

In 1994, a race for the U.S. House was decided by four votes. In 1998, a U.S. Senate race was decided by 400 votes out of 400,000 cast. In 2002, an anti-gun candidate won a state primary in Arizona by five votes. Last year, a pro-gun State Senator in Virginia was re-elected by less than 100 votes. And of course, in the 2000 presidential election, 537 votes in Florida elected George Bush U.S. President over Al Gore.

Think one vote doesn’t count? History is replete with examples such as these that demonstrate the importance of every single vote.

No doubt, many elections this year will be determined by the slimmest of margins. Will your vote make the difference? To ensure that pro-gun candidates prevail, NRA-ILA has launched an aggressive voter registration drive.

One of the most important components of this endeavor is a new webpage—www.nraila.org/vote2008 will provide you with all of your voter registration needs. Here are some of the many features you will find at www.nraila.org/vote2008:

Voter registration applications that can be completed, downloaded, and mailed to your elections officer to ensure gun owners are registered to vote;

Information on election dates and corresponding deadlines for the general and primary elections;

Links to identify and contact your local Election Volunteer Coordinator so you can work with NRA members and gun owners in your area to elect pro-Second Amendment lawmakers to office;

Ability to identify “Second Amendment Activist Centers” in your state to retrieve NRA-ILA materials;

Link to purchase your official NRA-ILA campaign yard sign, and;

All of the information and links currently found at www.NRAILA.org, and more!

Registering to vote is not only the most important step gun owners can take to ensure victory in the 2008 elections. It is also one of the easiest.

Please forward this link to all of your family, friends, and fellow firearm owners to ensure they are registered to vote as well.

Reposted with permission from the National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action

If you care about your Second Amendmednt rights, keep the pressure on your electeds to make certain this bill doesn’t get anywhere. When we lose the White House and Congress in November, this will be an even larger concern.

In 1974, Senator Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) said that the “manufacture and sale of handguns should be terminated. Existing handguns should be acquired by the states.” Since then, Kennedy has been the most anti-handgun member of the Senate, having introduced legislation to ban handguns, register handguns, license handgun owners, ban ammunition, authorize the Consumer Products Safety Commission to prohibit the manufacture of firearms and ammunition, and impose waiting periods on handgun purchases.

As we recently reported, on February 7 this year, ten days after endorsing another handgun ban supporter Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) for president, Kennedy renewed his efforts to ban handguns by introducing S. 2605, a bill that seeks to ban the manufacture, importation, and transfer (sale, etc.) of any semi-automatic pistol that does not possess “a microscopic array of characters that identify the make, model, and serial number of the pistol . . . etched into the breech face and firing pin of the pistol,” and stamp both sets of characters into the cartridge case of a round of ammunition, when the round is fired. On the same day, Representative Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.) introduced an identical bill, H.R. 5266, called the “National Crime Gun Identification Act.”

The Kennedy-Becerra bill is much more severe than the micro-stamping handgun ban passed in California last year. Where the California ban applies only to models of semi-automatic pistols that are produced after January 1, 2010, the Kennedy-Becerra bill would apply to all models of semi-automatic pistols.

Micro-stamping has repeatedly failed in scientific tests. Micro-stampings are easily removed. And most gun crimes cannot be solved by micro-stamping, or do not require micro-stamping to be solved. Additionally, most criminals who use guns get them through unregulated channels, thus micro-stamping may increase gun thefts, home invasions and other burglaries, and expand the black market in guns. Moreover, most guns do not automatically eject fired cartridge cases, only a small percentage of guns will be micro-stamped, and most violent crimes are committed without guns. Finally, micro-stamping would waste money—money that is better spent on traditional crime-fighting and crime-solving efforts.

DEKALB, Ill. – Another person shot when a gunman opened fire at a lecture hall at Northern Illinois University has died, bringing the toll to seven, including the gunman, a coroner said Friday.

This one, like some others before him, even stopped to reload. One gun. That’s all it would have taken. But that campus, like all the others, is a “gun free zone”….“To everyone except the killer.“

Folks, here’s another example of why guns laws for the most part are a joke. The only thing they do is prevent law abiding citizens from owning them. If a student with a background in firearms was able to carry a weapon, or get one from his/her vehicle, this could have been prevent. But as always, these bastions of Liberalism prevent that and have proclaimed “gun free zones” all over campus….but someone forgot to tell the killer that.

I hope Doug Ose isn’t reading this post because someone will have to explain to him what this means, he won’t be able to comprehend a criminal ignoring a “gun free zone.”

Link provided by KXNet.com

As we speak – the establishment is lining up behind Doug Ose.

Former Placer GOP Chairman Ken Campbell, who I have been at odds with over his actions towards John Doolittle, nails it on the head with this E-mail directed at Bruce Kranz after Bruce and Tom Hudson exchanged e-mails regarding Bruce’s decision to endorse OSE over Rico Oller.

Hat Tip – Ken Campbell!

Ken’s E-mail is pasted below:

Hey Bruce,

I just wanted to make the observation that by anyone’s standard, Doug Ose can not be considered a conservative. He holds a few far left views, and he has actively tried to push those views on us along with recruiting others to push those same views (through the Main Street Partnership).

For example, Doug believes it is O.K. to kill babies before they are born. Partial Birth Abortion- fine, eliminating the Mexico City Policy- fine, killing babies for research- fine (even though embryonic stem cell research has shown zero promise while adult, umbilical cord, or other stem cell research has shown great promise). Victims of Unborn Children – fat chance, fetal pain- too bad. Right down the line Doug has the radical view of endorsing the Culture of Death… and he tries to push it on us.

Another example, Doug believes homosexual marriage is great. Teddy Kennedy’s ENDA, no problem there. Hate Crimes legislation, sounds great. The traditional family structure is meaningless to Doug and he is all for forcing us to accept his radical view of homosexual marriage.

So he does not believe in Life or Traditional marriage, how about the war against Islamo-fascists? I really don’t know, he is a Republican so I am presuming he is O.K.

Certainly as a blue-blood, country-club Republican, I bet he is O.K. with the LOST (Law Of the Sea Treaty) currently in the Senate which hands over U.S. sovereignty to the UN.

This is a defining moment and we will see the real tightly-held principles of local politicians. Don’t like conservative Rico, fine, then go with conservative Eric Egland – they are both the same. (This Blogger agrees)

The bottom line is, whoever goes with Doug will forever be tagged on pro-life and pro-family slates and organizations as anti-life and anti-family. No one can endorse a radical pro-abortion, pro-homosexual candidate and not have that same distinction wrapped around their neck.

These endorsers will forever be tied to the rest of the “Conservative Republicans” in the Main Street Partnership such as Arlen Specter, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Chris Shays and Tom Davis. All these people are the people we fight as they try to remove the pro-life and pro-family planks from the national platform and the CA platform. These people constantly try to push their radical views on our families. These people are the people who are constantly trying to indoctrinate our young children in school. And by the way, these are the same people Bush fought as he pushed his tax cuts and tried to control spending.

These Main Street Partnership people are out of touch with America. They are the perfect illustration of what is wrong with Washington… people who think they know best trying to force their values on us.

Good luck,
Ken Campbell

World Net Daily – Posted: January 17, 2008

With a divided GOP field going into South Carolina, voters have a chance to make the Second Amendment an issue in this election. And they should.
South Carolina holds a distinctive place in our presidential nominating process. As the first in the South primary, its focus on faith, family values, military service and American traditions makes it one of the most conservative states in the country.

Anyone who’s ever campaigned in South Carolina will tell you that it’s worlds apart from many other parts of the country. And while Second Amendment rights are a sizeable factor in many states’ elections, in South Carolina you cannot win a general election if you’re seen as hostile to firearm freedoms.

That’s in general elections. In the GOP primary, you don’t even want to show your face in a crowd of Republicans if you aren’t ready to protect their gun rights.

Both Mike Huckabee and Fred Thompson have a perfect record for supporting Second Amendment rights. They’ve both talked about that in South Carolina and should make an issue of this latest development.

Is anyone listening? To all the Romney bandwagon jumpers…Where’s Mitt’s name here???

Mitt Romney really must take this opportunity to explain exactly where he stands on the Second Amendment. He angered gun owners in December by endorsing and promising to sign into law the Clinton gun ban and the Brady Bill on “Meet the Press.”Those were two of the worst anti-gun laws in American history. He should forcefully take a stand on this Justice Department brief, and while he’s at it he (Romney) should retract his support for these anti-gun laws.

-The writer of this article is the immediate past president of the NRA and a longtime member of the NRA Board of Directors.

This is VERY important folks, we need to protect our Second Amendment if we ever want to keep our other Constitutional rights!

“The question is whether the Second Amendment to the Constitution protects an individual right to ‘keep and bear arms.’”

Article

Giuliani Claims An Evolution On Gun Rights

“Glossing over the less appealing line items on his gun control resume, ex-NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani presented himself as sympathetic to the aims of the National Rifle Association and pledged, as president, to protect gun rights.”

Don’t believe the campaign machine, Rudy is no friend of gun owners and no Friend of the NRA. It’s important voters know who the real Rudy is and he’s a big gun grabber. We need to support and elect a good candidate who is truly behind the Second Amendment.