Methinks I am going to break my diet.

That is correct – the folks crying about equality and tolerance have been on a psychotic rampage against those of us who stood up for Prop 8.

Emboldened by destroying the career of a man who worked for the Sacramento theater company after they published his name and address from a donor list – the Homosexual lobby has decided to educate people in the ways of tolerance by targeting Leatherby’s Family Creamery.

The Leatherby family is very large – you can see their family on a picture on the wall of each location.They are also devout Catholics and supported Prop 8 vociferiously and financially.

So, the Gay rights lobby has decided to seek revenge… they have begun to persecute the Leatherby’s. Don’t be suprised if you have to run a gauntlet of pickets to get to their locations.

To support the Leatherby’s you can visit any of their locations – there is a location on Arden near Howe… in between Fulton and Howe.

The location nearest Placer County is Sunrise and Antelope Rd.

I have never seen a group of people act so poorly after losing fair and square – someone also needs to tell the Governor that No outspent Yes.

I thought it was about equality – I guess not…

Here we go again….

By Aurelio Rojas
Published: Thursday, Nov. 06, 2008 | Page 1A
Sacbee.com

California’s battle over gay marriage shifted from the ballot box to the courts Wednesday as stunned opponents of Proposition 8 declared they had too much at stake to concede.

Advocates of the measure to end same-sex marriage were certain they had succeeded in amending the state constitution to declare that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized in California.” But hours after they declared victory, the ACLU and a coalition of gay rights groups challenged the measure in the state Supreme Court, a move one backer called an “insult to California voters.”

Opponents charged in their court petition the measure is invalid because it would undo the state constitution’s commitment to equality for everyone.

The suit also contends the initiative process was improperly used because only the Legislature can place a measure before voters to so radically revise the state constitution.

Jenny Pizer, an attorney with the gay rights group Lambda Legal, said that allowing voters to remove a protected right conflicts with the constitution’s basic ideals of equality.

“That’s too big a change in the principles of our constitution to be made just by a bare majority of voters,” Pizer said in a statement.

In May, the state Supreme Court ruled that a measure voters approved in 2000 violated the state constitution’s clause on equal protection. Since then, more than 17,000 gay couples have been married, and weddings continued Wednesday.

Unlike the 2000 measure, Proposition 8 is a constitutional amendment that supporters are confident will withstand legal challenges.

Andrew Pugno, an attorney for the “Yes on 8” campaign, called Wednesday’s lawsuit “frivolous” and “completely lacking in merit.”

“Their position is absurd, an insult to California voters and an attack on the initiative process itself,” Pugno said in a statement.

Mathew Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel and dean of the Lynchburg, Va.-based Liberty University School of Law, noted the court found earlier this year “there was no merit” in the revision argument.

“This is a constitutional amendment. It was on the ballot rightfully. (Opponents) have to accept the will of the people. They might not like it, but that’s our democratic process,” Staver said.

He said his group believes gay marriages in California this year are not valid but that it has no plans “to go out and roam the countryside trying to invalidate” them.

Democratic state Attorney General Jerry Brown told reporters his office would defend marriages “contracted during the time when the right to same-sex marriage was the law of California.”

He said same-sex marriages enacted in recent months were not only lawful “but a fundamental constitutional right.”

“The measure that was written by the Yes on 8 people was very simple, one sentence. It did not say the measure was retroactive,” he said. He said civil measures must state specifically they are retroactive in order to be so.

Yet Brown said his office would also defend the “will of the people” in Tuesday’s election against challenges to its legality.

“As Proposition 8 is challenged … we will defend the law as enacted by the people of California,” he said.

Wednesday’s suit was filed nine hours after supporters declared victory. With all precincts reporting, the measure was leading 52.5 percent to 47.5 percent, a difference of about 400,000 votes.

As a watershed election – Massachusetts and Connecticut are the only two other states where same-sex marriage is legal – the campaign generated more than $73 million in contributions.

Supporters of the measure said their side also benefited from a get-out-the-vote effort that included 100,000 volunteers.

Campaign officials said they were able to tap into higher-than-expected support from black voters, who were drawn to the polls by presidential candidate Barack Obama, and from Latino voters.

The apparent approval of the measure was a crushing blow for gay rights activists, who had hoped public opinion had shifted enough to help them block it.

LINK

WWCBD? We already know that he has come out of the closet against Prop 8. We have seen his campaign destroying McClintock signs, knocking them down and defacing them.

If I find out who vandalized Karen England’s house, I will kick their - myself. If someone vandalized Jeff Flint’s house, the nimrod will wind up with a golf club up their obama before I get to them… Why? Does anyone think that Jerry Brown’s office would actually prosecute?

Meantime – Charlie continues to hide, or at least try to… but he has to come up for air sometime. THE PROP 8 CAMPAIGN IS OFFERING A REWARD FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THE VANDALS DESTROYING SIGNS AND FOR INFORMATION ON THOSE LOSERS THAT VANDALIZED KAREN’S HOUSE IN ROSEVILLE.

This is posted as sent by Yes on 8.

Yes on Proposition 8 Offers Reward for Vandals and Thieves of Yard Signs

Thousands of traditional marriage supporters have been victimized by the so-called “tolerant” opponents. Reports are pouring in from across the state of voters’ Yes on Proposition 8 signs being vandalized or stolen. Yes on Proposition 8 staff members’ homes have also been targeted for vandalism and theft.

To protect the safety of our staff and fellow voters in our district, the Yes on Proposition 8 campaign will offer a $1,000 reward leading to the arrest and conviction of the vandals and thieves targeting our homes in Roseville.

“Destroying and stealing personal property-this is tolerance?” questioned Karen England, with Yes on Proposition 8. “What are opponents so scared of that they are attempting to intimidate and silence us?

“Opponents of Proposition 8 claim that we have nothing to fear about government-mandated same-sex marriage; it won’t impact our freedom of speech or religion. How can we believe them when they’re stealing our freedom of speech from our own front lawns? “This is the type of intimidation and true intolerance we can expect without Proposition 8. This should be a wake-up call for every voter concerned about our precious First Amendment freedoms. That’s what Yes on Proposition 8 is all about-saving our freedoms.”

Please email any and all leads to StoptheHate2008@gmail.com

That’s right, Charlie’s angels are in full bloom.

Contact: Karen England

916-212-5607

Charlie Brown’s Extreme Anti-Marriage Support

Yes on Proposition 8’s campaign director Karen England issued the following statement regarding 4th congressional candidate Charlie Brown’s opposition to Proposition 8:

“For California families, there is no other political issue this election as important as saving marriage. That’s why it is imperative that voters support only candidates who respect traditional marriage. Charlie Brown’s astonishing opposition to Proposition 8 reveals just how out of touch he is with citizens in the 4th congressional district—and the overwhelming majority of Californians and Americans.

“After evading the issue for months, Mr. Brown finally declared that he does not support Proposition 8. This means that Mr. Brown supports four activist judges overturning Proposition 22, and imposing their social agenda on Californians.

“Not only am I working to pass Proposition 8, I’m a resident of the 4th congressional district. I know my fellow voters in this district—they’re my neighbors and friends. In his opposition to Proposition 8, Mr. Brown sides with radical liberals who certainly don’t represent the values of our community.

“Given his outright opposition to the most essential issue to families-the definition of marriage-Mr. Brown is not the candidate voters in support of marriage will ever support.”

A 4th congressional district resident from Roseville , Karen England is the campaign director for Yes on Proposition 8. This voter-supported campaign committee is dedicated to educating voters about the issue of marriage. To learn more, visit www.YesonProposition8.com

$8 a gallon Gas or a big fat Oil Derrick?

The two huge issues in the fall election -

Gay Marriage and Gas Prices.

The Democrats are amazing me – it is starting to look like 2006. Except this time it isn’t Republicans and spending, it is Democrats and Oil Drilling / Refinery Construction.

Anyone who thinks that real America is not going to react to the Dems selling themselves out to the Enviros has another thing coming.

Gay Marriage – I have already been accused of spreading hate for quoting scripture and pointing out that Homosexuals are advancing their agenda at the expense of religious freedom.

Some choices are wrong – the Democrats are going to stand up for $8 a gallon Gas and Gay Marriage. America is going to stand against that.

If you have any questions – let’s put commercials up showing Gay Marriage ceremonies and see how those play in swing states.

Normally the AP is pathetically biased in their articles.

This article features touching picutres of Homosexual couples crying over being able to get married today. It is as if they have been emancipated or if this is some huge civil rights victory.

Of course, every socially progressive event usually occurs at the expense of religious freedom.

Read this article and note the theme – courts in the Northeast are furthering the discrimination against the Church in favor of homosexuals. It looks like we are right back to discriminating against one group to correct perceived wrongs against another…

Article

This is positively scary… the Church should now be on the endangered species list.

It should give everyone pause that the Homosexual community and their supporters need to advance their cause at the expense of the Church.