Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

O.C. LINCOLN CLUB STRONGLY URGES A "NO" ON PROPS 94-97, THE INDIAN GAMBLING COMPACTS

Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on January 23, 2008 at 07:12 PM

Finally, a GOP club with some b_alls!

“The Lincoln Club recommends a No vote on all four Indian gaming measures (Propositions 94-97) because we believe ratification of the compacts would perpetuate and expand the unfair monopoly that the state unwisely granted to a small group based solely on racial preferences.”

-From the Flash Report

California Term Limits

Posted by Ben Mavy on January 07, 2008 at 09:08 PM

Just got a call from some California Firefighters group campaigning for the term limits measure. They claim to also have the support of the California Police Chiefs Association and some Highway Patrolman Association. Let’s see…Greedy/Corrupt unions and overpaid ticketwriters say yes, how should I vote?

Placer County Republican Party Positions on Statewide Ballot Measures

Posted by Aaron Park on January 02, 2008 at 08:16 PM

Proposition 91– Yes
(This more firmly dedicates gasoline sales taxes to transportation projects. This is necessary because the legislature has exploited the loopholes in Prop 42 every year to continue to squander our gas tax money.)

Proposition 92 – No
(This is “ballot box budgeting” at its worst. It would irresponsibly reduce community college tuition, regardless of need, while permanently increasing taxpayer subsidies.)

Proposition 93 – No!
(This is phony term limits reform designed to keep Democrat leaders in office longer. Whether you support term limits or hate them, this proposition is a fraud and it should be defeated.)

Proposition 94 – Yes
(This referendum would ratify the compact with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians. Indian gaming has been terrible for California , but defeating this compact will not solve that problem or improve things in any way. This compact is the best possible deal that taxpayers can get out of the current Legislature. Union thugs oppose this compact because it does not achieve their goal of forcing casino workers to pay union dues without their consent. The issue here is union politics, not Indian gaming.)

Proposition 95 – Yes
(This referendum would ratify the compact with the Morongo Band of Mission Indians. Indian gaming has been terrible for California , but defeating this compact will not solve that problem or improve things in any way. This compact is the best possible deal that taxpayers can get out of the current Legislature. Union thugs oppose this compact because it does not achieve their goal of forcing casino workers to pay union dues without their consent. The issue here is union politics, not Indian gaming.)

Proposition 96 – Yes
(This referendum would ratify the compact with the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation. Indian gaming has been terrible for California , but defeating this compact will not solve that problem or improve things in any way. This compact is the best possible deal that taxpayers can get out of the current Legislature. Union thugs oppose this compact because it does not achieve their goal of forcing casino workers to pay union dues without their consent. The issue here is union politics, not Indian gaming.)

Proposition 97 – Yes
(This referendum would ratify the compact with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. Indian gaming has been terrible for California , but defeating this compact will not solve that problem or improve things in any way. This compact is the best possible deal that taxpayers can get out of the current Legislature. Union thugs oppose this compact because it does not achieve their goal of forcing casino workers to pay union dues without their consent. The issue here is union politics, not Indian gaming.)

Immigration debate unifies California GOP

Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on December 06, 2007 at 01:19 AM

PCRA’s own Tom Hudson was quoted in this LA Times article about the GOP unifying around Prop 187.

Link to article here

Moderates lose ground as the primary focuses attention on the issue that once split the party.
By Phil Willon
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

December 5, 2007

Thirteen years after a ballot measure against illegal immigration fractured the state Republican Party, the issue again is front and center in California’s upcoming presidential primary.

Moderates who have argued that an unyielding stance against illegal immigration would further erode the party’s strength in this increasing polyglot state have effectively been silenced by GOP forces calling for a hard-line crackdown.

The escalating rhetoric in the GOP presidential primary has fed their retreat.

So, too, has a striking increase in the number of Californians who blame illegal immigration for the state’s problems.

“There is more unity among Republicans in this state on illegal immigration than on anything else, including taxes,” said Tom Hudson, chairman of the Republican Party in Placer County, near Sacramento, one of the most conservative counties in the state.

Prospects for overhauling health care in state look poorer

Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on December 05, 2007 at 03:42 PM

Tom Chorneau, SF Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

(12-05) 04:00 PST Sacramento—An expected vote on legislation overhauling California’s $170 billion health care system has been postponed indefinitely, as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders disagree on elements of the plan from tax subsidies to insurance reform.

Good news to those of us who know “free” healthcare will be more expensive and more cumbersome than what we have today.

Healthcare debacle

GOP's California ballot plan rakes in cash

Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on November 25, 2007 at 08:45 PM

“Backers of a California ballot initiative that would drastically increase Republican chances of retaining the White House in 2008 have raised $1.2 million, including $316,000 in eight days this month — and supporters say they’re on pace to qualify for the vote in June.”

“California Counts’ initiative would divide the state’s 55 electoral votes proportionally, rather than using the current winner-take-all format.”

“That would be a huge boon to the eventual Republican presidential nominee, since the GOP has little chance of carrying California, which has voted Democratic in the past four presidential elections.”

CA GOP

Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722