Reprinted from Steve Frank -

Makes me proud that as a taxpayer, Planned Parenthood (PP) is doing so well in the grant getting business. I disagree with PP, but they have a right in a free nation to exist. They do not have the right to my tax dollars. This is an organization that refuses to turn in rapists, promotes abortions, tell teenagers NOT to talk to their parents. These are bad people, and they, using our money and our government schools, promote their brand of sexual activity for 12 and 13 year olds. They make it clear, “don’‘t have sex at 12, but if you do we will provide you with birth control devices and abortions, and never tell your parents. Plus, we will not turn in any male, 14 years old or 40 who got you pregnant—we will keep your secret and that of the rapist.” All of this on our dime. Shame on local, county, State and Federal governments that give money meant for crime prevention, education and health care.. Is this how you want to spend your tax dollars? Pass this one to family and friends. Let your elected officials you think this is an abuse of your family. Speak out against this, write letters to the editor and use this information. Write your thoughts directly on the web site for all to see. To see the complete story click on the URL below.

Steve Frank’s Blog

Doug Ose was laying it on so thick on the Eric Hogue show that we had to parcel out his comments over three posts.

The final installment in the Doug Ose Bs-O-Meter Rampage is attached below.

Hopefully after listening to this – you will be motivated to help perform a Partial Birth Abortion of Doug Ose’s campaign for office.

Javascript and Flash must be enabled and installed to play this audio file.

This is what happens with modern media – liberals, just can’t spin their way out of accountability any more.

Ose says he is “Personally Pro-Life” but also talks about abortion in the first trimester being OK!? Not even John McScam is that conflicted.

The overarching theme of his answer to his LIFETIME “F” RATING from NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE… is to avoid the question and take credit for the reduction in the rate of abortions. The real reason why there aren’t as many abortions is the “Morning After Pill”.

Lie Number Three in the Ose Radio Trifecta as proven by the following:

Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted NO on funding for health providers who don’t provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Rated 61% by the Christian Coalition: mixed voting record on families. (Dec 2003)
Lifetime “F” Rating from National Right to Life

As Dr. Campbell wrote – Doug Ose is a scorecard watcher… he will vote correctly on a series of inconsequential amendments or procedural votes and then vote the wrong way once at the last key place. This way – they will get scores from the ACU (in Ose’s case from 64%-80% in a given year) but be able to really vote the wrong way. The ACU factors in too many votes to be as accurate as the scorecard of the pro-life council laid out below:

Ose voted for a hostile substitute to the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (9/30/1999, roll call 464). Ose then voted against the real Unborn Victims of Violence Act (9/30/1999, roll call 465).

Ose again voted for a hostile substitute of the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (4/26/2001, roll call 88) and against the real Unborn Victims of Violence Act (4/26/2001, roll call vote 89).

And again Ose voted for a substitute in 2004 (2/26/2004, roll call 30) and against the real thing (2/26/2004, roll call vote 31).

Meanwhile an anon commenter who is on Ose’s staff rolls out one roll-call vote where Ose actually voted pro-life and then uses that as a basis to call Dr. Campbell a liar.

Strategic voting is a deceptive practice and the way Ose’s courageous anonymous supporters are presenting rebuttals and half-truths is not ethical.

Ose’s received a 64% score from the American Conservative Union twice while in Congress – those same years, several Democrats had higher scores.

In addition: In fact Doug Ose’s pro-life voting record is so bad he earned a 35% in the 106th Congress, 26% in the 107th Congress, and 36% in the 108th Congress. (as in only 36% Pro-Life, an abortion of a voting record)

Rico Oller does not have to think about how he votes – because he has the instincts of a Republican.

According to on the issues – Ose could not hide the following:

• Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
• Voted NO on funding for health providers who don’t provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)

Basically Ose supports Human cloning for the purposes of harvesting the parts of the clone for medical research.

The second “No” vote is even more troubling:

Abortion Non-Discrimination Act of 2002: Vote to pass a bill that would prohibit the federal, state and local governments that receive federal funding from discriminating against health care providers, health insurers, health maintenance organizations, and any other kind of health care facility, organization or plan, that decline to refer patients for, pay for or provide abortion services. In addition the bill would expand an existing law “conscience clause” that protects physician training programs that refuse to provide training for abortion procedures.

Ose’s no vote means that he thinks the Government should force (through withholding funding) an organization whose Doctors have a “conscience clause” so they won’t have to do abortions against their will, to in fact have to provide abortions or lose their funding.

This No vote also means he favors forcing health plans to have to pay for abortions as well.

As we speak – the establishment is lining up behind Doug Ose.

Former Placer GOP Chairman Ken Campbell, who I have been at odds with over his actions towards John Doolittle, nails it on the head with this E-mail directed at Bruce Kranz after Bruce and Tom Hudson exchanged e-mails regarding Bruce’s decision to endorse OSE over Rico Oller.

Hat Tip – Ken Campbell!

Ken’s E-mail is pasted below:

Hey Bruce,

I just wanted to make the observation that by anyone’s standard, Doug Ose can not be considered a conservative. He holds a few far left views, and he has actively tried to push those views on us along with recruiting others to push those same views (through the Main Street Partnership).

For example, Doug believes it is O.K. to kill babies before they are born. Partial Birth Abortion- fine, eliminating the Mexico City Policy- fine, killing babies for research- fine (even though embryonic stem cell research has shown zero promise while adult, umbilical cord, or other stem cell research has shown great promise). Victims of Unborn Children – fat chance, fetal pain- too bad. Right down the line Doug has the radical view of endorsing the Culture of Death… and he tries to push it on us.

Another example, Doug believes homosexual marriage is great. Teddy Kennedy’s ENDA, no problem there. Hate Crimes legislation, sounds great. The traditional family structure is meaningless to Doug and he is all for forcing us to accept his radical view of homosexual marriage.

So he does not believe in Life or Traditional marriage, how about the war against Islamo-fascists? I really don’t know, he is a Republican so I am presuming he is O.K.

Certainly as a blue-blood, country-club Republican, I bet he is O.K. with the LOST (Law Of the Sea Treaty) currently in the Senate which hands over U.S. sovereignty to the UN.

This is a defining moment and we will see the real tightly-held principles of local politicians. Don’t like conservative Rico, fine, then go with conservative Eric Egland – they are both the same. (This Blogger agrees)

The bottom line is, whoever goes with Doug will forever be tagged on pro-life and pro-family slates and organizations as anti-life and anti-family. No one can endorse a radical pro-abortion, pro-homosexual candidate and not have that same distinction wrapped around their neck.

These endorsers will forever be tied to the rest of the “Conservative Republicans” in the Main Street Partnership such as Arlen Specter, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Chris Shays and Tom Davis. All these people are the people we fight as they try to remove the pro-life and pro-family planks from the national platform and the CA platform. These people constantly try to push their radical views on our families. These people are the people who are constantly trying to indoctrinate our young children in school. And by the way, these are the same people Bush fought as he pushed his tax cuts and tried to control spending.

These Main Street Partnership people are out of touch with America. They are the perfect illustration of what is wrong with Washington… people who think they know best trying to force their values on us.

Good luck,
Ken Campbell

The attached ARTICLE details how the abortion rate is at it’s lowest since 1974.

The rate is 11+ per 1,000 or a bit over 1%.

“Only” 1.2 million cases of legalized infanticide occurred last year.

Read the article and you can tell the slant right away – it makes you feel like only 1.2 million murdered “fetuses” is a bad thing. If it wasn’t for crisis pregnancy centers, Christians (and Mormons) getting in the way… the abortion mills wouldn’t be so upset about business dropping off.

This article illustrates that the abortion issue is a winner for social conservatives. Why? People are using contraception and more women are realizing that this is a life in their womb.

Even Doug Ose (who supports abortion at any time, fully funded with tax dollars as well), would acknowledge that Medi-Cal paying for one woman to have seven abortions is an outrage. (A good friend who works for Sac County has told me that several of his clients have had 3-7 abortions at a cost of $6,500 a piece to the taxpayers)

The voters must think so, too. Surveys still show strong majorities oppose taxpayer funded abortion and think abortion should not be legal after the baby (fetus) has brain waves and a heartbeat. (roughly 6 weeks)

The establishment Republicans run from this issue to their own peril while Americans are figuring it out on their own. Yet another place where the GOP has lost an opportunity.

Romney? One of the attacks being leveled against him is that he flip-flopped on this issue. I posted an article a few months ago from a Massachusetts paper lambasting him for being pro-life long before he decided to run for President.

McCain? used to be pro-life until he decided Lieberman and Kennedy were his best buddies. Endorsed by liberals such as Doug Ose and Jim Nielsen who are two of his delegates from California. (both are pro-choice)

Rudy? I am sure one of his mistresses had to have an abortion.

Fred Thompson and Mike Huckabee are right on this issue.

Rico Oller – as Pro-Life as they come. Another reason why Rico is the “Choice” of the 4th CD.

UPDATE: Steve Frank has also weighed in on this issue Steve’s Blog Post

Please note that Steve’s blog is having some technical issues – his post about abortion is January 20th’s post.