Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

WWCBD?: Pro Life Protesters Roughed up at DNC (Charlie and the Life Issue)

Posted by Aaron Park on August 30, 2008 at 10:40 AM

Look forward to seeing tons of Kool-Aid drinkers at the NRC convention being treated with kid gloves. Remember, these protesters are usually anarchists, luddites and communists.

These are the people who chain themselves to the gates of power plants, bomb Hummer dealerships, torch developments and the like. They have to commit property damage before the police do anything – however in Denver, the latest chapter in the heavy-handed tactics against pro-life groups occurred.

WWCBD? Would Charlie stand up to Nancy Pelosi and the abortion mills to fight for these girl’s rights?

Watch this u tube video

WHO ARE THESE GIRLS?

DENVER, Aug. 28 /Christian Newswire/—On Wednesday, August 27, police officers brutally arrested two teenage girls, ages 15 and 17, near Senator Obama’s Denver hotel. The young women, Julia Giacopuzzi and Jayne White, were writing messages in sidewalk chalk on the public sidewalk when the police officers rushed in and violently arrested the girls without warning or provocation.

The girls are members of the pro-life youth organization Survivors, and were in Denver during the Democratic National Convention to call attention to Senator Barack Obama’s pro- abortion position as part of A Prayer for Change.

Throughout the DNC, the youth of Survivors were using sidewalk chalk throughout the city of Denver with the permission of City Attorney David Fine and Denver Deputy Chief of Police John Lamb. It was understood by the young women that sidewalk chalk was an accepted medium, and they were given no warning by the police before being cuffed and dragged away.

WWCBD? We know that Charlie is an abortion-rights supporter. While Brown has avoided any public statements on this issue like most other issues, his website is pretty clear.

From the Brown website: “Charlie supports existing law governing a woman’s right to control her own reproductive health care choices. He believes that promoting a culture of life means helping to reduce the number of abortions, through greater access to health care information, counseling, and other preventive services.”

Since the Democrats took control of congress in 2006 – funding for abstinence programs has been all but eliminated and the faith based charity initiative has been gutted. This means that Charlie will again have to take a stand against Pelosi if he is serious about his statements on his website.

Are you noticing a theme? It is called campaign ethics. Brown is walking a tightrope – he is wedged between his own campaign statements and the policies of Pelosi and the Dem leadership.

It does not stop there – you should listen to Brown speak at those fund-raisers he attends.

Comments

There are 0 comments on this post. Post yours →

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722