The Per-Diem Controversy Answered Definitavely
Posted by Aaron Park on August 24, 2008 at 07:25 PM
Have you noticed that the Charlie Brown campaign has changed-up their tactics from calling McClintock’s acceptance of Per-Diem payments a Felony (crime) to saying it is something he shouldn’t be doing?
They also purport to understand Tom McClintock’s finances so well that they can render a judgement as to weather he can afford to maintain two residences on just his salary. If McClintock was greedy, he’d work in the private sector… he’d make way more there!
Information has come to this blogger that a Woman from Sun City Lincoln, one of the strongest areas of support for Brown in 2006, sent a letter to the Attorney General’s office.
The sudden change by the Brown team tells me that they were involved in the request for information.
Take a look at the attached letter…
The letter makes a huge point – it says that a sitting member does not need to maintain a residence in their district once elected. This is why I see the “A46” car parked on American River Drive. Amazingly, that is the residence of Fabian Nunez. So, the argument that millions was spent on making doesn’t hold water.
In addition – the letter is signed by two very well known liberals. John Waldie’s father was a very liberal Congressman from the bay area.
When you read the letter – you can rapidly ascertain that the letter writer was alleging legal impropriety against Tom McClintock.
The attempt by the Brown team to gain a campaign issue went up in smoke.
Sorry Charlie! Maybe you will campaign on issues now?
Comments
There are 0 comments on this post. Post yours →
Post a comment
Required fields in bold.