The E-Mail Sent by Brown That Contains Falsehoods and Advocates Voting For State Budget
Posted by Aaron Park on August 18, 2008 at 08:47 PM
This E-mail was sent by Contact@CharlieBrownforCongress.org – please note that the graphics are broken down into their html code and were left in this post to verify authenticity of the seriously misleading and groosly inaccurate campaign e-mail from Charlie Brown.
Charlie Brown for CongressContribute
Join Us
Volunteer
Dear 4th District Residents,
If you didn’t do your job, you wouldn’t get paid. Right now in Sacramento,
Tom McClintock’s not doing his job. But while the state of California still
doesn’t have a budget, nothing happens to Tom McClintock. He’s still getting
paid in full.
I agree with Governor Schwarzenegger – if politicians aren’t going to do
their job, they shouldn’t get paid. That’s why I support a law that requires
a balanced budget in four years or Congress does not get paid.
Because if you don’t do your job and you don’t deliver results – you don’t
deserve your salary.
Maybe in L.A., where State Senator McClintock is from, they see things
differently. But in Northern California, we pay for results, not rhetoric.
Call Tom McClintock at his Thousand Oaks office in Southern California at
(805) 494-8808 and tell him we want results.
Sincerely,
Charlie Brown
Signature<http://dl.arganot.com/fs/distribution:letterFile/x3ky22chelwu3g_fi
les/xb9dlscxwilxdd>
Charlie Brown, Lt. Col. USAF Ret.
Point One – Brown falsely claims (aka lies) that McClintock is getting paid while there is no budget.
Point Two – Brown falsely claims that McClintock is doing nothing (not doing his job) – leading one to easily conclude that Brown says doing his job is voting yes on the Governor’s budget deal which includes sales tax increases and thinly veiled deficits.
Point Three – Brown singles out McClintock, but attacks all 40 Sentaors in the process.
Point Four – California has a balanced budget law, but it is so poorly written that it is a sham. It’s nice for Brown to say he supports such an amendment, but like so much on Brown’s website and campaing (like obama’s) it lacks anything specific.
Point Five – Brown goes back to the Southern California thing, it worked so well for Ose, didn’t it? It looks like Cuba just isn’t getting Brown enough traction in spite of his supporters at the Auburn Journal doing his bidding?
Do you think the Auburn Journal is going to pick up a story about these falsehoods from Brown’s Campaign? Do you think the Auburn Journal is going to take Brown to task for advocating a yes vote on the current budget?

Comments
There are 0 comments on this post. Post yours →
Post a comment
Required fields in bold.