Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Jennifer Montgomery (in her own words) using the Death of Soldiers as a Political Prop

Posted by Aaron Park on July 28, 2008 at 07:51 AM

12/23/2004 Letter

(Notice how the Yellow Elephants are back…)

Are you happy?

So far 19 dead in this week’s attack on the mess tent in Iraq. What a terrific Christmas present for their families. And what does our President have to say about this? According to the Associated Press, “President Bush said the explosion should not derail the elections and that he hoped relatives of those killed know that their loved ones died in ‘a vital mission for peace.’”

There is now an opening for any Truckee Bush voters in Iraq – 19 openings to be specific (actually 1,325 since the start of the war). Or better yet, I nominate the Bush twins to go serve in Bush’s “vital mission for peace.”

You got what you voted for. Are you happy?

Jennifer Montgomery

Soda Springs

So, here you have it – Jennifer Montgomery celebrating the death of Soldiers to make political points.

In addition, she shows a lack of creativity, trotting out the Nancy Pelosi Yellow-Elepahnt argument. (You can’t support the war unless your son is serving, you have served or are serving, etc…)

Next, she uses their death as a entree into explaining why people should vote Democrat instead. That is sick and extreme…

Now, she is running for Supervisor – for what reason? When you read the above, you have to wonder what her purpose for becoming a supervisor will be.

So much for the concept of “Non-Partisan Office”...

Comments

There is 1 comment on this post. Post yours →

Nick Freitas

No problem Aaron, Ill play by those rules.

Yes as a matter of fact I am serving.

Yes as a matter of fact I am happy that Bush got elected.

No as a matter of fact I don’t appreciate your willingness to use the deaths of people (who statistically speaking would be appalled by your comments) for your own petty political ends.

Yes, the vast majority of the military do support this war.

No we are not the mindless robots that John Kerry would have you believe. We are actually rather adept at sizing up complex geo-political concepts, sensitive cultural norms , and indigenous political implications, mixed with a little threat of death before 0900.

Most of us do it without your self aggrandizing bachelors degree in multiculturalism gender studies (what do you use that for anyway?)

So if it is a veteran you want defending this war, here I am, with my money firmly placed where my mouth is.

Would you care to debate the conflict in detail.

I would be more than happy too. It wouldn’t be the first time myself or a colleague of mine has had to shed a little light on your intellectually bankrupt philosophizing.

So you just let me know. Ill even store the sarcasm and don my calm, cool and collected hat so you don’t get intimidated.

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722