Lower Auto Insurance Rates? Stopping a Trash Rate Increase? (Oh, those RINO Placer Supes)
Posted by Aaron Park on June 25, 2008 at 09:19 AM
Last year there were three evil $1 per car fee/taxes proposed by Sherrif Ed Bonner and the Placer County Sherrif’s department. Around the same time was a debate about Landfill tipping fees.
To start off, the RINO supervisors voted to reduce the tipping fees at the landfill.As a result of the reduction that averaged $11 per person – it has cancelled almost all of the effect of increased costs of diesel fuel. Despite diesel fuel going up some 30%, trash collection fees have only gone up an average of $1.37 per address in Placer County.
That alone is a good case for the re-election of Bruce Kranz and Kirk Uhler. I like RINO’s like that.
Evil $1 tax/fee number three – the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program was withdrawan by Sheriff Bonner and the department after Kirk’s questioning. That is correct – when they could not justify the fee/tax increase to Kirk – they pulled the proposal and have not brought it back.
Evil $1 tax/fee number two – Fingerprinting Equipment in Police Cars. Kirk was the lone no vote in a 4-1 vote in favor. Kirk felt that the money could be found in the budget without having to increase the car fee/tax. At that, the effeciency of having the equipment has aided law enforcement considerably in the field.
Evil $1 tax/fee number one – Joint Vehicle Theft Task Force.
This passed 5-0, in the 11 months it has been in effect… the $300K that has been raised has resulted in $835,000 in recoveries in stolen vehicles. If government could produce those kinds of results with taxes/fees, our taxes/fees would be quite low all the way around.
Your Auto Insurance rates will also reflect this – since 7/1 of last year…
Safeco took a 14.5% reduction in Placer County
Oregon Mutual 20%
Unitrin Specialty 33%
Traveler’s twice, totalling about 12% – targeted sepcifically to Placer County
Hartford changed Placer into their least expensive territory effectively lowering rates 7%
These numbers reflect that Placer has received larger reductions in Comprehensive rates (that part that covers auto theft) than surrounding counties.
This compares to the Auto Insruance Market as a whole which has flattened out. (some carriers have raised rates)
Meantime – in Sacramento County, my car was vandalized recently and my wife’s car was broken into a month ago. The perps could have stolen either car if they wanted to.
Rates in Sacramento County are some 15% higher than Placer all things being the same.
Thanks to the RINO supervisors Bruce Kranz and Kirk Uhler – my wife and I are motivated to move back to Roseville so our cars stay in one piece.
In conclusion – while getting assailed over the two $1 fee/tax increases the Supervisors are denied any credit for policies that froze out alomst all of the effects of fuel costs on trash collection.
While getting assailed over the two $1 fee/tax increases, the Supervisors are denied any credit for the effects of said fees leading to Auto Insruance reductions. Reductions that are greater than all surrounding counties – suggesting that Placer has done something special to warrant that treatment… the Task Force?

Comments
There is 1 comment on this post. Post yours →
Great post,
There are many different companies that you can use when you need to purchase auto insurance. It is not always easy to decide what company to use or what coverage you will need for your car. Plus if you want to get inexpensive car insurance than you need to know some tips to help you. Here are some tips that anyone can use to get the insurance you need for a good price.
Auto insurance companies will give you inexpensive car insurance when your vehicle is safe and low profile. In other words, if your car has safety features, is sturdy so that there won’t be repairs that are expensive and if your vehicle is not likely to be stolen or broken into than you can get good insurance without the hefty price.
Post a comment
Required fields in bold.