Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Abortion / Cloning, What's the Difference? What does Team Ose know that the National Right to Life Doesn't?

Posted by Aaron Park on May 08, 2008 at 01:09 PM

I had to stop and ask myself, self… why do all those Bible-thumping Right-Wing Wacko Pro-Life Groups include Human Cloning on their scorecards???

The National Right to Life, the Eagle Forum and the CRA/NFRA all take Human Cloning seriously, but put cloning and abortion into the same (divisive) life column.

Doug Ose said on the radio that every abortion is a tragedy. I agree with him, but unlike O-Si I mean it…

I posted Doug Ose’s clip on the radio several weeks ago

Every Abortion is a Tragedy -

HR 503, Roll Call #89 April 2001 – Unborn Victims of Violence Act – Voted NO. While every abortion is a tragedy according to Ose, murdering a fetus during the commission of a crime doesn’t merit a criminal penalty.

H Amdt 27 to HR 503, Roll Call #88, weaken the Unborn Victims of Violence Act – this vote occurred before Ose voted against the act itself, further underscoring Ose’s hardcore Pro-Choice position. The “Fetus” is not a life, therefore Ose voted no on making it a crime to hurt an unborn child in the womb and voted to gut the bill he knew might pass. No wonder why he scores 32% from National Right to Life.

In addition – in 1999, HR 2436 Roll Call #464 – Ose voted no on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act by voting Yes on a Hostile Substitute. Then on HR 2436 Roll Call #465 the actual Act itself which Ose voted No on as well.

Staying consistent after 1999 / 2001 – in Feb 2004 H amdt 465 to HR 1997 Roll Call #30 – Ose voted Yes to a hostile substitute to the Unborn Victims of Violence Act.

Every Abortion is a tragedy, except an unborn child in the womb of a Woman who is assaulted or raped.

Well maybe we could stop Abortions if we taught kids about not having sex, correct? Ose doesn’t think so (explains his ‘mixed’ record on family issues and his 48% score from the Eagle Forum)

H Amdt 377 to HR 3061 Oct 2001- transfer $33 Million for Sex education to Abstinence programs – Ose Voted No. Apparently, the right to have sex as a teenager is more important to Ose than stopping teenage pregnancy.

H Amdt 221 to HR 2660 Roll Call #352, July 2003 – Prohibit Taxpayer Money for sex research – Ose voted No. Now that we have de-funded abstinence programs, we need to study the results with more tax dollars, right?

To be continued…

Comments

There are 0 comments on this post. Post yours →

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722