Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Ose's Contempt for Life

Posted by Aaron Park on May 20, 2008 at 03:10 PM

Conclusion of Earlier Post:

In the effort to punch any hole they can in Tom’s Armor – Ose supporters attempted to suggest that McClintock supports Human Cloning. Meanwhile – Charlie Brown is getting a free pass. If you think Charlie Brown will have any better a record on the Life issue – think again. Charlie Brown is and will be beholden to Nancy Pelosi if he wins.

What has been established is that Tom McClintock was endorsed by the Eagle Forum, the National Right to Life and the California Republican Assembly. (the CRA) These three endorsements represent three organizations that rarely, if ever endorse someone who is soft on the life issue.

Ose, however helped pave the way for the California Supreme Court Legalizing Gay Marriage. (HR 3313, Roll Call #410, July 2004 – Marriage Protection Act – Voted No.)

Ose, also helped pave the way for destroying human life in the name of science – we are not talking cloning, but rather taking conceived embryos and “harvesting” the cells for research. This is called embryonic stem-cell research.

HR 4682, 108th Congress – Co-Sponsored a bill to provide for Embryonic Stem Cell Research. California’s stem cell proposition that passed was modeled after this creation out of the mind of Doug Ose.

Destroying embryos is a waste of tax dollars in the name of Abortion. Embryonic stem cell research has produced no significant breakthrough. Adult stem cells, which do not require killing a life to get, have yielded many breakthroughs.

Ose, once again placed his social agenda ahead of science and the taxpayers. (Just like he did when he voted against oil drilling four separate times in four separate areas of the US – if you think Charlie Brown is going to vote to drill ANWR… look at his Prius.)

Ose also voted to use tax dollars to pay for abortions:

By voting to repeal prohibition against Military medical facilities performing abortions – June 1999, May 2000, May 2003, May 2004

By voting to to repeal prohibition of abortion coverage in federal employee health plans – July 1999, July 2000

Are you starting to read that Ose attacks along these lines are absurd? If you think Charlie Brown will vote any differently, you will have another thing coming. When Pelosi and the Democrat Base start breathing down his neck – he will have no “choice”.

Now the Coup d’Etat -

HR 2505, Roll Call #304, July 2001 – Human Cloning Ban, Ose voted No.

Just to make sure, Ose had a second chance – a clone of the Human Cloning ban re-appeared… HR 534, Roll Call #39, Feb 2003 – Ose Voted No.

Once again, we have a case of the facts dooming Ose.

People care about $4 a gallon gas – Ose voted against Drilling

The CA Supreme Court is trying to force Gay Marriage on us – Ose Voted against the Defense of Marriage Amendment

Ose wasted our tax dollars on bunk science and voted to use our tax dollars to pay for abortions for federal employees and soldiers.

Now- do you understand why Ose spent $1.8 Million on Per Diem attacks against McClintock? Ose can not discuss the issues – because his record says, “I am a Liberal”.

Meantime – Ose has gone on Tilt, shifting to fratricidal attacks against McClintock. It seems that Ose is content to do damage now that polls show him in a distant second, thereby assisting Charlie Brown in the fall.

Comments

There are 0 comments on this post. Post yours →

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722