Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

The Sacramento Bee Reminds us of why to Vote for Bruce Kranz

Posted by Aaron Park on May 10, 2008 at 07:35 AM

ICYMI -

Bob Houston proudly emailed his endorsement by the Sacramento Bee – the same Sacramento Bee that trashed Bruce Kranz when he ran against Rex Bloomfield. Rex Bloomfield was a fundraiser for Boxer and a longtime Sierra Club booster.

Given that Bob Houston has spoken out publicly against private property rights – it comes as no surprise that the granola-crunchers on the Sacramento Bee editorial board would endorse Bob Houston.

Speaking of other great endorsements – the Log Cabin Republicans endorsed Sue Horne. What that means is anyone’s guess – I wonder if the Bee is not too far behind there as well.

The Sacramento Bee Editorial Board can be read here.

For your benefit – I am providing some excerpts as to why the Bee endorsed Bob Houston – Think Anti-Growth and John Doolittle.

Kranz, a protégé of U.S. Rep. John Doolittle, came into office in 2004 by defeating Rex Bloomfield, a favorite of environmentalists. Over the past four years, he’s been highly engaged and has surprised some of his detractors.

OK – Clue Number one, Kranz is a Doolittle protege, and he committed the egregious sin of taking out the Sierra Club’s number one supervisor in Placer County.

In 2006, Kranz joined with Doolittle and developers in an unsuccessful attempt to unseat Weygandt, a moderate who as a supervisor has been an important voice for planned growth and open space preservation. This year Kranz is supporting Proposition 98, an eminent domain initiative that would make it harder for agencies to enforce environmental regulations and acquire land for public works.

Fortunately, there’s a candidate in this race who better suits the moderate conservatism of this rural district. Bob Houston, a longtime resident of Meadow Vista, has thrown $100,000 of his own money into his first run for office. He vows not to be beholden to anyone, opposes Proposition 98 and is wary of the scale of the proposed Royal Gorge project.

What does Bob Houston have in common with Ose? He is trying to buy the race, is a Moderate (according to the Bee), opposes development and opposes taxpayers by supporting Prop 99.

Finally, anyone who thinks Robert Weygandt is not involved in this race should look no further than this “endorsement” by the Bee of Houston.

P.S. There is more going on here. Let’s hope Kranz gets 50% +1 and we don’t go into a runoff.

Comments

There are 2 comments on this post. Post yours →

Pat Buchanan Jr.

Bruce Kranz is backing liberal Doug Ose for Congress. I don’t want Ose representing me in Congress, or anywhere else for that matter. I can’t support someone who is that shortsighted as to support a liberal, pro-tax, anti-gun, anti-baby for national office. I can’t and won’t support Bruce Kranz until he renounces his support of Ose.

Gordon Ainsleigh

I guess you’re depending on the people to never wonder-as I often wonder-why you support so many ethically-compromised politicians. Kranz and Michelle talked about her land deals before he nominated her for Planning Commissioner, and a County attorney warned him about the investigation before the Supes voted to confirm her. And even then, and he didn’t choose to withdraw her name from consideration. The picture I get is that he’s just another corrupt slime-ball Chicago-Democrat style politician. It speaks volumes that you support this level of corruption in government. You better go wash your hands. They smell of indictment.

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722