Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Ose's Troubles Continue - Supporting Open Borders and now an FEC Complaint!?

Posted by Aaron Park on April 11, 2008 at 08:40 AM

This is from the Placer GOP Central Committee

OSE CAMPAIGN ACCUSED OF VIOLATING FEDERAL ELECTION LAWS

The Placer County Republican Party Files a Formal FEC Complaint against Ose for Failing to Disclose Campaign Contribution

Roseville— The Placer County Republican Central Committee has filed a formal complaint with the Federal Elections Commission in Washington D.C. alleging that Doug Ose’s Campaign for Congress distributed a direct mail piece that violated federal elections laws.

Ose is running against State Senator Tom McClintock in the Republican Primary for the 4th Congressional District to replace Rep. John Doolittle.

“Placer County Republicans request an immediate investigation,” said Tom Hudson, Chairman of the Placer County Republican Party. “We believe that the Ose Campaign engaged in unfair campaign practices and violated federal election laws.”

According to the complaint, the Ose Campaign for Congress recently sent voters a direct mail piece that shows an illustration of opponent Tom McClintock that is both silly and demeaning. The problem for Ose is the so-called ‘creative material’ is identical to the graphic artwork used against McClintock by then-opponent Dean Andal in the 2002 Republican Primary campaign for State Controller. McNally-Temple & Associates is the consultant for both Doug Ose and Dean Andal, currently a GOP candidate for Congress in the 11th Congressional District. Andal was not named in the complaint filed by Placer County Republicans.

“The law is quite clear about proper reporting of contributions to political campaigns,” said Chairman Hudson. “Ose is a liberal millionaire who can afford to pay for his own campaign material. Instead, Ose and his consultants recycled artwork from another candidate. The question is, who paid for this work and why wasn’t it reported properly?”

“This item had value to Andal in 2002 and has obvious value to Ose in 2008,” said Hudson. “That makes this an in-kind contribution that must be reported by Ose.”

There are many questions that need review by the FEC. Did Ose’s campaign and consultants get permission from the original owner of the material, Dean Andal, to use the recycled artwork from the 2002 race for State Controller? In other words, did Andal approve this attack piece on McClintock? Did Ose and his consultants properly disclose the in-kind contribution from the original owner of the artwork? Was “state money” used illegally to fund a federal election campaign?

“Placer County Republicans believe that once Ose failed to report the contributions properly, Ose violated federal campaign laws. We request an immediate investigation by the Federal Elections Commission,” Hudson said.

Absentee voters will begin casting ballots for the June 3rd California Primary in less than 30 days. “Time is of the essence,” he concluded.

Comments

There are 0 comments on this post. Post yours →

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722