Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Taped phone calls attempt to reinvent Doug Ose - Lew Uhler style.

Posted by Aaron Park on February 23, 2008 at 10:54 AM

I have quoted a line from the James Bond Movie – For Your Eyes Only, when Bond looked at the Crossbow-wielding Vixen and said, “When you want revenge – you’d better dig that second grave.”

Team Ose has been using Lew Uhler and his endorsement of Doug Ose to the hilt. Recently, Uhler signed a letter touting Ose as a tax-fighter and taped phone calls went out voiced by Uhler proclaiming Doug Ose to be a Conservative Republican.

Either Lew has failed to do his research on Ose or his desire to act upon a 12 year grudge against Rico Oller has consumed him to a point of egregious political prostitution.

Besides the fact that Ose gives money and support to Democrats over Republicans and was a leader in the Main Street Partnership – a “Republican” group dedicated to attacking Conservatives…

A few of the High Points regarding Ose’s record are as follows:

Voted NO on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Sep 2004)

Ose Voted NO on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance. (Sep 2004) Remember Michael Newdow and “Under God”.

Ose Rated 61% by the Christian Coalition: mixed voting record on families. (Dec 2003)

Ose Rated D+ by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record. (Dec 2003) And has a lifetime “F” rating from Gun owners of America.

Ose Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration. (Dec 2003) FAIR is an Immigration watchdog group – according to their information Ose opposed the border fence as well.

Ose Rated 59% by NTU, indicating “Satisfactory” on tax votes. (Dec 2003)NTU = National Taxpayer’s Union

Lew Uhler’s organization gave Ose a tax-fighter award according to the taped phone call. Apparently, all it takes is a 59% anymore to earn an award. When I was in school, 59% was an “F”.

Apparently, Uhler has changed the definition of a conservative to include someone who opposes traditional marriage, opposes “Under God”, is pro-choice, anti-2nd amendment, anti-1st amendment, mixed on family issues, scores 59% from the NTU and supports open borders.

“When you want revenge, you had better dig that second grave”. The desire to “get” Rico Oller has led Uhler down the garden path.

Comments

There is 1 comment on this post. Post yours →

Pat Buchanan Jr.

I just got my Ose for Congress mailer from Uhler’s National Tax-Limitation Committee tonight. Wow, they must have been in bed together at some point to get this endorsement. Ose loves taxes. There’s a long list of publicly elected endorsees on this mailer and I won’t ever vote for any of them again. I’m posting it to my fridge so I don’t forget.

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722