Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Auburn Journal takes a shot at the Placer GOP Committee

Posted by Aaron Park on February 23, 2008 at 10:28 PM

Below is a comment I left on the column that I am linking…

Column

Jim – I will address only the issue you raise about the Placer GOP Committee’s endorsement being divisive.

The elected officials in this county have all endorsed – well most of them. The members of the GOP Committee are themselves elected, so it is consistent that they should be able to endorse as well.

In your effort to write your column to show the committee as divided, you omitted the previous motion to supress was defeated by a count of 4-21. This means that there were 21 votes to support – actually 22 if you include Ken Campbell who had to leave early. the final vote of 17-8 was because 4 people had an issue with there being no notice – not because they didn’t support Rico.

the opinion of the committee was that Doug Ose’s views are inconsistent with the voters that elected the committee members to their offices. Ose is pro-choice, F rated by Gun owners of America, voted against the defense of marriage amendment and has voted for open borders.

Further, in your column… you blame Tom Hudson for the loss of GOP Registrations further underlining your bias against the Central Committee. The loss of Registrations has more to do with the State GOP having no money for a registration program and the poor performance of Governor Arnold than anything you lay at Hudson’s feet.

The Central Committee would not be doing its’ job if it was acquiescent with everything the leaders of the GOP are doing - including supporting a congressional candidate like Doug Ose who is scarcely different than Charlie Brown.

Comments

There is 1 comment on this post. Post yours →

Pat Buchanan Jr.

What does this bozo Jim at the Journal know anyway? And why does his opinon matter about the Placer GOP club? They can nominate and back whoever they want. He’s basically acting like the head of the RNC telling what they can and can’t do. Why should they wait and see who gets the nomination? What if that person is not right for the party or for the 4th Congressional District? Don’t Americans have the right to back whoever they want? Are we just supposed to be spoonfed and told who to support? That’s the worst advice I’ve ever heard of. So Jim can inject his views into this debate but the Placer GOP can’t express their views on the Congressional nominee for their own party? Maybe Jim should move to China.

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722