Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Ose is a BIG spender... (Lew Uhler missed the memo)

Posted by Aaron Park on February 21, 2008 at 08:28 PM

Folks – many of you may have seen a letter signed by Lew Uhler telling all of us that Doug Ose is a Reagan Republican and a Tax Fighter.

Uhler is President of the National Tax Limitation Committee. I think Lew forgot to do his homework before endorsing Doug Ose…

From Ken Campbell Re-Posted with his permission

Ose the BIG Spender

Posted by: Ken Campbell | 02/21/2008 10:46 AM

But Ken, Ose can’t be a big spender; he received the endorsement of Lew Uhler of the National Tax-Limitation Committee, right? Let me explain that, many years ago Rico Oller badly beat Lew’s son Kirk in an Assembly race. After all these years, Lew and Kirk have never gotten over that. Lew Uhler has put personality above conservative principle by endorsing Big Spender Ose.

We all remember the “thumping” the Republicans received in 2006 in large part due to their spending addiction. Discretionary domestic spending- excluding defense and the war on terror- increased faster under Republican control than under any Democrat since LBJ. During the six years Ose was in Congress, he was part of the big spending problem.

For example, with Medicare already heading for bankruptcy, the Republicans, along with confirmed big spender Ose, passed the largest expansion of the Federal government since the Great Society- the budget busting Medicare Prescription Drug Bill (HR 1, roll call #669, 11/22/03).

Ose voted for a plethora of other irresponsible and wasteful spending, such as grants for studies on “Mood Arousal and Sexual Risk Taking”, “Sexual Habits of Older Men”, “San Francisco’s Asian Prostitutes/Masseuses”, “American Indian Transgender Research”, and “Child Health and Human Development Study on Pandas” (HR 2660, roll call # 352, 7/10/03), all paid for courtesy of the Placer County taxpayers.

Ose voted to spend taxpayers’ money on mohair subsidies (roll call vote #383, 7/11/00), wood utilization (roll call vote # 160, 5/26/99) and peanut competitiveness (roll call # 161, 5/26/99). I could continue on, but I think you get the idea.

Ose repeatedly voted against the conservative Republican Study Club budget that would cut wasteful spending (roll call vote #73, 3/23/00) (roll call vote # 79, 3/20/03), and for a Democrat budget (roll call #75, 3/25/99)

How bad was Ose’s spending addiction? In the 107th Congress alone Ose sponsored 37 bills to increase spending by whopping $46.7 billion.

And for all this reckless spending Lew Uhler gave former Sacramento Congressman Ose a taxpayer’s award? Go figure.

Comments

There are 0 comments on this post. Post yours →

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722