Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Ken Campbell - Ose Likes Pornographic Art More Than Fire Protection

Posted by Aaron Park on February 16, 2008 at 08:56 PM

We all know Ose is Pro-Choice and Pro Gay Marriage – this post from Ken shows Ose’s consistently liberal views on every issue.

Ose would rather waste tax dollars on garbage social programs than use the money to build infastructure. Remember – the Main Street Partnership is all about the Environment.

Ken Writes -

Supervisor Bruce Kranz tells us he supports Doug Ose because Ose is good for Placer County’s District 5. District 5 extends from north Auburn to Lake Tahoe and is in fact the district Kranz represents.

In order to understand what Doug Ose has done to District 5, you must understand how much Ose loves the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). The NEA (read taxpayers) funds “art” that cannot find funding elsewhere. The crucifix in a jar of urine was their best-known “art” exhibit along with what was called “homo-erotic art”. Honestly I am too embarrassed to describe that “art”, but I am sure you can imagine.

With my quick research I found that left-of-center Ose voted at least three times not to make minuscule cuts and not fund this “art”—HR 2466, July 14, 1999, roll call vote 287; in 2000 with HR 45, roll call vote 282; in 2001 with HR 2217, roll call vote 184.

How this relates to District 5 is found with HR 5093, 7/17/02, roll call vote 314.

Tom Tancredo’s amendment would have transferred $ 50 million from the NEA to the US Forest Service, and Ose voted against this.

Remember much of District 5 is US National Forest including the Tahoe Basin. What is the purpose of the US Forest Service? They manage the forest…. and prevent forest fires. Think Smokey the Bear.

So for left-of-center Ose, and apparently Bruce Kranz, a NEA funded (read Placer taxpayer funded) crucifix in urine is more important than forest (and fire) management in the Tahoe Basin. I guess this is called priorities.


I don’t know if I’d lump Kranz into loving the NEA – but Ose favoring the NEA over forest fire protection is an abomination.

Comments

There is 1 comment on this post. Post yours →

Pat Buchanan Jr.

Oller v. Ose’s CRA scoring record:
2000 CRA Assembly Scorecard
Oller: 100%
2001 CRA Senate Scorecard
Oller: 95%
(dinged 5% for a missed vote due to a health issue)
2003 CRA Senate Scorecard
Oller: 100%
2004 CRA Senate Scorecard
Oller: 100%
Rico has an A+ rating from the NRA and was given the Defender of Freedom Award by the NRA in 2000. Chris Cox from the NRA has nothing but the best to say about Rico and how well he defends the Second Amendment. They backed him in 2000 and will no doubt be backing him again in this race.
From a press release dated 1/17/08 from the Gun Owner of America:
“Rico has a primary opponent in former liberal Republican Congressman Doug Ose. During Ose’s six years in Congress, he earned a GOA “F” on every single one of our ratings for house members. Doug Ose probably has his picture framed and hanging on the wall at Handgun Control Inc. (now the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun violence), since he was one of their best friends in Congress.
In contrast — Rico Oller was a perfect “A” rated member of the California Legislature during his tenure. And, Rico is the human equivalent of the “energizer bunny.” This guy is a type A++ personality, who never stops campaigning and promoting our Second
Amendment rights. Every time Gun Owners has an event in California, Rico Oller is there, promoting our organization and the Second Amendment. And he will be there for gun owners all over the country when he is elected to Congress.”
Ose on the issues:
Voted NO on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Sep 2004)
Ose Voted NO on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance. (Sep 2004)
Ose Voted NO on banning gay adoptions in DC. (July 1999)
Ose Voted NO on military border patrols to battle drugs & terrorism. (Sep 2001)
Ose Supports immediate reductions in greenhouse gases. (Sep 1998)
Ose Voted NO on passage of the Bush Administration national energy policy. (June 2004)
Ose Voted NO on implementing Bush-Cheney national energy policy. (Nov 2003)
Ose Rated 61% by the Christian Coalition: mixed voting record on families. (Dec 2003)
Ose Voted NO on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1. (June 1999)
Ose Rated D+ by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record. (Dec 2003)
Ose Voted NO on reporting illegal aliens who receive hospital treatment. (May 2004)
Ose Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration. (Dec 2003)
Ose Rated 59% by NTU, indicating “Satisfactory” on tax votes. (Dec 2003)
From Human Events:
“Easily the hardest-fought GOP primary for the U.S. House was in the 3rd District (Sacramento), where moderate Republican Rep. Doug Ose is retiring after six years. In what could be a dramatic upset, at press time, former State Attorney General (1990-94) and 1998 gubernatorial nominee Dan Lungren held a slim lead over the long-presumed front-runner, State Sen. Rico Oller, by far the most conservative candidate.”
Lungren helped steal guns from law abiding citizens and he supports Ose so you can be assured that Ose will help Dan in Congress take the rest of our Second Amendment rights and flush them down the toilet!
Rico for Congress!!!

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722