Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

OTT: Partisan Democrat Charlie Brown Silent on Pelosi, Rangel Ethics Charges

Posted by Aaron Park on October 03, 2008 at 08:43 PM

This post brought to you by Aaron F. Park, Proprietor, Charlie Brown’s house of Pain…

“This has gone on long enough. Elected officials are guardians of the public trust, and must be above any perception of wrongdoing.” Charlie Brown, 4/11/06

Democrat Charlie Brown was quick to point the finger at Republicans he claimed were engaged in unethical behavior. But partisan Democrat Brown remains silent as evidence mounts that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi directed almost $100,000 from her Political Action Committee to her husband’s business. Pelosi has also contributed $12,000 to Brown’s campaign for congress.

“As we saw in his refusal to return tainted campaign cash to Democrat Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee Charlie Rangel, Brown talks a good game about ethics but fails to utter one word criticizing Democrat big wigs when they are ethically challenged,” McClintock for Congress Communications Director Bill George said. Brown has held on to $11,500 in tainted campaign cash sent to him by Rangel. “Charlie says he’s independent, but while other Democrats call for reform Brown ducks the issue and keeps the cash,” George said.

Congressman and Democratic Senate candidate, Rep. Mark Udall of Colorado called on Rangel to step down as Chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee in light of his three ethics investigations for questionable practices. Iowa Rep. Dave Loebsack gave up his $5,000 in Rangel contributions. Newspaper editorial boards all across the country have called on Rangel to resign and for Democratic candidates to give back his contributions. “Charlie Brown should join Udall’s call for Rangel to resign. Charlie should return the money he’s received from his fundraising accounts. And he could make a few pithy quotes about Pelosi’s ethics in shoveling money to her husband,” George said. “As Charlie said, ‘this has gone on long enough.’”

(Cue up Guns and Roses in the background)

Comments

There are 0 comments on this post. Post yours →

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722