Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Ken Campbell writes a thesis framing the Ose vs Oller race...

Posted by Aaron Park on January 29, 2008 at 10:26 PM

As we speak – the establishment is lining up behind Doug Ose.

Former Placer GOP Chairman Ken Campbell, who I have been at odds with over his actions towards John Doolittle, nails it on the head with this E-mail directed at Bruce Kranz after Bruce and Tom Hudson exchanged e-mails regarding Bruce’s decision to endorse OSE over Rico Oller.

Hat Tip – Ken Campbell!

Ken’s E-mail is pasted below:

Hey Bruce,

I just wanted to make the observation that by anyone’s standard, Doug Ose can not be considered a conservative. He holds a few far left views, and he has actively tried to push those views on us along with recruiting others to push those same views (through the Main Street Partnership).

For example, Doug believes it is O.K. to kill babies before they are born. Partial Birth Abortion- fine, eliminating the Mexico City Policy- fine, killing babies for research- fine (even though embryonic stem cell research has shown zero promise while adult, umbilical cord, or other stem cell research has shown great promise). Victims of Unborn Children – fat chance, fetal pain- too bad. Right down the line Doug has the radical view of endorsing the Culture of Death… and he tries to push it on us.

Another example, Doug believes homosexual marriage is great. Teddy Kennedy’s ENDA, no problem there. Hate Crimes legislation, sounds great. The traditional family structure is meaningless to Doug and he is all for forcing us to accept his radical view of homosexual marriage.

So he does not believe in Life or Traditional marriage, how about the war against Islamo-fascists? I really don’t know, he is a Republican so I am presuming he is O.K.

Certainly as a blue-blood, country-club Republican, I bet he is O.K. with the LOST (Law Of the Sea Treaty) currently in the Senate which hands over U.S. sovereignty to the UN.

This is a defining moment and we will see the real tightly-held principles of local politicians. Don’t like conservative Rico, fine, then go with conservative Eric Egland – they are both the same. (This Blogger agrees)

The bottom line is, whoever goes with Doug will forever be tagged on pro-life and pro-family slates and organizations as anti-life and anti-family. No one can endorse a radical pro-abortion, pro-homosexual candidate and not have that same distinction wrapped around their neck.

These endorsers will forever be tied to the rest of the “Conservative Republicans” in the Main Street Partnership such as Arlen Specter, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Chris Shays and Tom Davis. All these people are the people we fight as they try to remove the pro-life and pro-family planks from the national platform and the CA platform. These people constantly try to push their radical views on our families. These people are the people who are constantly trying to indoctrinate our young children in school. And by the way, these are the same people Bush fought as he pushed his tax cuts and tried to control spending.

These Main Street Partnership people are out of touch with America. They are the perfect illustration of what is wrong with Washington… people who think they know best trying to force their values on us.

Good luck,
Ken Campbell

Comments

There are 2 comments on this post. Post yours →

Pat Buchanan Jr.

Very well put, Ken, I couldn’t agree more.

Jackie Chiles

Well put indeed, Ken. You sound like a true Oller disciple. Calling Ose a baby killer (classy!) and threatening those that support him. Keep up the good work, the voters really love this kind of mudslinging, personal-attack politics.

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722