Vote 'No' on Loomis school bond Measure G
Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on January 25, 2008 at 12:25 PM
(Editor’s Note – The Placer CRA has endorsed No on G, we were attacked by a Loomis School Board Member before we even took that position. Carol Goldberg is a friend of the CRA, our membership roster is not public knowledge)
Does anyone know Carol Goldberg? Maybe we ought to make her an honorary member of the PCRA, she sounds awesome! I know the PCRA hasn’t taken positions yet but this was a guest commentary in the SacBee today and I wanted to post it.
“What happens when you cross a sore loser with people who like to spend other people’s money?
The answer is Measure G – a copy of last year’s defeated local school bond (Measure M), heavily pushed by the Loomis Union School District. Measure G is an unnecessary school bond that will increase your taxes for 25 years.
Why was this bond measure reintroduced immediately after you voted against it?
It not only proposed an unnecessary bond based on misinformation but also encourages more taxation and mismanagement of your tax dollars.
Measure G will not improve education, nor will it increase property values. But it will guarantee one thing: It will put money in pockets where it doesn’t belong.”
Read the full, well written article here
Comments
There are 2 comments on this post. Post yours →
Why can’t the Loomis School board go get a low interest loan from the State of CA?
It would be cheaper, wouldn’t it?
Better yet, why don’t they manage their money better?
Post a comment
Required fields in bold.