Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

News from the Measure H Campaign

Posted by Aaron Park on January 15, 2008 at 03:55 PM

This was in the local media the other day -

Measure H is the Clover Valley Development referrendum.

United Auburn Indian Community to Buy Sacred Sites, Increase Open Space If Measure H Passes

The United Auburn Indian Community has announced plans to purchase land encompassing culturally sensitive sites held sacred to the Tribe in Clover Valley, contingent upon a “yes” vote on Measure H and the approval of the Rocklin City Council.

The Tribe’s purchase, combined with Measure H, would protect much of Clover Valley as open space from the threat of urban sprawl and reduce the number of homes that Clover Valley owners proposed to build from 558 to 404. Measure H also calls for 366 acres of open space, but that total would increase to 406 acres with the Tribe’s purchase.

ARTICLE POSTED HERE

Hierarchy: previous, next

Comments

There are 2 comments on this post. Post yours →

Mike Finch

1. The UAIC can buy the sacred sites any time it wishes—right now, in fact. So why make the “buy” contingent upon a voter bribe? (Hint: Casino expansion, Clover Valley cross-valley highway, shortcut to casino… Get it?) The real dilemma for the tribe is which do they value more—customers via the shortcut (in addition to the 14,000 more cars even before the casino expansion), resulting in drinking gamblers driving through residential neighborhoods OR their sacred sites?
2. Read the fine print on the purchase announcement: It’s only a potential purchase with the strings attached; it is only an “option” for saving “some” of the “important” sites. Strangely enough, the cross valley highway they want actually wipes out some prehistoric sites as well! Once again, Rocklin is being hoodwinked.
3. Verbal real estate deals cannot be enforced, and that’s all this is—a big smokescreen to seduce voters to vote the wrong way. A NO on H vote is the only way to protect my home from wall-to-wall unsafe traffic in my neighborhood. Gridlock is bad enough if it’s on a freeway, but this development is a disaster for tens of thousands unsuspecting quiet homeowners (and their rights as well!).

Carlenemb

Don’t forget, this is private property in which the owner should be allowed to do with as he pleases. This is a “right” that should not be denied. If you don’t like this plan your sure not going to like what will happen if the No side wins. Its called MORE houses and vitually no open space. Duh! Its a no brainer, vote YES ON MEASURE H!!!

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722