Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Fred On Fire in South Carolina

Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on January 15, 2008 at 11:15 AM

This piece does a good job of explaining the inaccurate thoughts and views on Fred’s run for President. Fred is misunderstood and he has the true Conservative views and credentials and is the only true conservative voice running in the GOP today.

Fred On Fire in South Carolina
by Martha Zoller
Posted: 01/15/2008

More than once, pundits or pollsters have said, “Fred just doesn’t have the fire in his belly,” or “have you noticed in debates Fred runs out of things to say before his time has run out?” Perish the thought; a candidate should actually answer a question without qualifiers and get to the point. I am tired of hearing candidates go on for three minutes when they’ve been asked a simple question requiring a “yes or no” answer.

The mainstream media and some cable outlets don’t like Fred. Dick Morris said before Thompson announced that he wouldn’t pass muster because when people realize that he’s not that guy on “Law and Order,” they won’t like him. In Iowa on Caucus Day, George Stephanopoulos and his colleagues across the airwaves counted Fred out. They said that he’d be out that night. Instead of being out, he “got a ticket to the next dance.”

That is Fred Thompson’s message to every Republican primary voter. The Reagan Coalition is not dead, but it is in need of a new leader. The voters are jaded by a Republican Congress who squandered the majority and by an Evangelical President they thought was a Reagan conservative. They are discouraged but they might find what they are looking for in Fred Thompson.

This was a good article. Read the entire article here.

Comments

There are 3 comments on this post. Post yours →

Cato

Sorry Pat,

If you want a conservative nominee you need to get behind Governor Romney. Aside from Fred’s unwillingness to apologize for his assault on the 1st amendment by shepparding McCain-Feingold throught the Senate, he is one of only two conservatives in the race. It stinks, but his campaign has been a flop and he is only spreading out the conservative vote by staying in the race. Please thank Fred for being a good American, and start campaigning for Mitt, the man with the most wins, the most votes, and the most delegates. Anything else is pulling for McCain, Huckabee, or Guiliani.

Pat Buchanan Jr.

Are you kidding? What about Romney’s flip flops on Abortion, Gun control, border control, illegal immigration and so on…
He only became pro life 2 years ago,when he decided to start a paper trial for running for President. Fred has the endorsement of nearly every major conservative interest group including the National Right to Life. He’ll probably get the NRA endorsement too. Romney also supports national health care. I don’t see much difference between Mitt and Billary. Mitt and the word conservative shouldn’t even be used in the same sentence. He defines a politician saying everything the voter wants to hear. That’s not a true Conservative nor does it show any leadership.

Nick Freitas

Fred Thompson has admitted that McCain Feingold was a bad choice on his part….

much like Romney admitted that being pro choice, pro gun control, and distancing himself from Reagan were all bad choices on his part.

Look, we can have this debate all day, and I’m fine with that, in the end I will vote for our nominee, but at least get the facts straight in the mean time.

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722