Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Immigration debate unifies California GOP

Posted by "Pat Buchanan, Jr." on December 06, 2007 at 01:19 AM

PCRA’s own Tom Hudson was quoted in this LA Times article about the GOP unifying around Prop 187.

Link to article here

Moderates lose ground as the primary focuses attention on the issue that once split the party.
By Phil Willon
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

December 5, 2007

Thirteen years after a ballot measure against illegal immigration fractured the state Republican Party, the issue again is front and center in California’s upcoming presidential primary.

Moderates who have argued that an unyielding stance against illegal immigration would further erode the party’s strength in this increasing polyglot state have effectively been silenced by GOP forces calling for a hard-line crackdown.

The escalating rhetoric in the GOP presidential primary has fed their retreat.

So, too, has a striking increase in the number of Californians who blame illegal immigration for the state’s problems.

“There is more unity among Republicans in this state on illegal immigration than on anything else, including taxes,” said Tom Hudson, chairman of the Republican Party in Placer County, near Sacramento, one of the most conservative counties in the state.

Comments

There are 3 comments on this post. Post yours →

Tom Hudson

Jeff, you are re-writing history and contributing to an urban legend. I assume that is because you were not involved in the early stages of Proposition 187, back when Pete Wilson was vociferously opposing it and using the same arguments that the Democrats later used against him. You need to know more about the real history of that campaign, not the distorted version of the campaign that Democrats and their media allies have been making up ever since they lost.

I was a member of the California Republican Party Executive Committee back in 1994 when we voted to loan the Proposition 187 campaign $100,000 (at the request of then-Assemblyman Dick Mountjoy) to help the campaign kick-start its fund-raising operation. I will never forget how a parade of Pete Wilson’s appointees gave speech after speech AGAINST the initiative to the Executive Committee. Dick Mountjoy and Mike Spence spoke in favor of it, as did a couple of other past and future California Republican Assembly Presidents. In response, we were repeatedly told that Governor Wilson would never support it and it was bad for the California Republican Party. Fortunately, the people who were not on Wilson’s payroll supported the donation overwhelmingly and we were able to help get the campaign going despite his opposition. The California Republican Party did not “jump on the issue” after it passed; the California Republican Party was in full support before the measure even qualified for the ballot.

You claim that “there were only 2 well known Republicans backing Prop 187 style laws in the 1990s. Pete was one, the other was David Duke.” The truth is that almost every elected Republican in California initially supported Proposition 187 EXCEPT Pete Wilson! For example, the measure had near unanimous support among Republican legislators, including quite a few who may have been as well known in California as David Duke was at that time.

You said, “I was so impressed that Pete was willing to put this career on the line to support this important issue.” The truth is that Pete Wilson was the least popular Governor in California history at that point, at least as far back as the public opinion polls had been published, and his career was already on the line. Governor Wilson did not change his mind and decide to support Proposition 187 until (1) it had qualified for the ballot despite his vocal opposition and (2) his consultants showed him that he had the support of less than a quarter of the voters and Proposition 187 had the support of more than three-quarters of the voters. Only at that point did Pete Wilson courageously put his career on the line by supporting an initiative that was three times more popular that he was. What a profile in courage that was—NOT!

You dredge up Jack Kemp, Robert Bennett, Bill Kristol, Linda Chavez, and President Bush as prominent Republicans who opposed Proposition 187, but you fail to mention that they were all attacked by loyal Republicans for their stupid positions on that issue. Jack Kemp, who had always been a favorite among conservatives, had his speeches interrupted by booing and heckling when he dared address the issue at all. It destroyed any chance that he may have had of winning the Republican nomination for president in 1996!

I am not saying that Proposition 187 had no opposition. Every position on every issue has opposition. My point is that enforcing the laws against illegal immigration and ending the taxpayer subsidies for illegal aliens had overwhelming support among Republicans back then, far more support than almost any other issue with which the Party has been associated.

Pat Buchanan Jr.

Tom, name me 5 top ranking national Republicans with skin in the game in 1994 who publicly supported Prop 187 and 209?

Pat Buchanan Jr.

Tom, after reading this further I need to clarify something. This was actually a very controversial issue Pete Wilson supported back in the mid 1990s so I have to disagree that there was unity among the GOP on this issue at both the state and national level. There were only 2 well known Republicans backing Prop 187 style laws in the 1990s. Pete was one, the other was David Duke. I know because this was a very big issue in my book and I was so impressed that Pete was willing to put this career on the line to support this important issue that it was the catalyst which made me decide to go work for him. I recall seeing a help wanted sign placed by UPS at Sierra College for a truck loading job that read “women and minorities only.” When applying for a college internship at Nike, I noticed they also had a statement at the bottom of the application that only women and minorities would be accepted into the program. No one thought he could run and win on this issue and he in fact beat Kathleen Brown by over 20% in 1994. It was then the GOP jumped on this issue. Even Jack Kemp, Robert Bennett, Bill Kristol and Linda Chavez, all who were very prominent and influential within the GOP ranks at this time, were dead against this issue. Kemp was Dole’s Presidential running mate in 1996. Even your President, George W. Bush, as Governor of Texas, was outspoken against Prop 187. This issue was later used against Pete when he was thinking of running against Boxer for her Senate seat in 2004 and he later decided against a run. I don’t think there was unity then and even now, we have a President who is carefree about having an open border even though he supposedly is tough on terror.

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722