Doug Ose for Congress

Rico Oller for Congress

California Republican Party

Republican Main Street Partnership

PCRA Weblog

Republican Commentary
for the Masses

Which way do they want it on Earmarks?

Posted by Aaron Park on December 23, 2007 at 03:02 PM

Proof that the ABD caucus are just that – the ABD caucus. They don’t really know what they want – other than anyone but Doolittle.

Witness 2006 shill candidate for Charlie Brown – Mike Holmes… he gets two digs in against John Doolittle. This article details how the Congressman secured federal funds for several projects important to the district.

On one hand – the Earmark division of the ABD Caucus will point to the 2007 batch of earmarks as Doolittle once again thumbing his nose at all 10 of them that care about earmarks.

On the other hand – the No Auburn Dam division of the ABD Caucus is whining because while they got a huge Earmark, there were two others that were left on the table.

Mike “No Dam(n) Holmes” couldn’t resist the opportunity to get a cheap shot in – while complaining that Auburn didn’t get every earmark they wanted, Holmes attributed the reason to Doolittle no longer being on the appropriations committee.

Note to Holmes – 1. You won’t be on the appropriations committee either. 2. Doolittle still brought home an incredible array of Earmarks despite resigning from the appropriations committee.

The Auburn Journal article in question is linked here

Note the following items John Doolittle addresses for us:

More funding to build the new bridge around the Folsom Dam.

Funding for Sierra College technical education programs

Funding for wastewater treatment plant

More funding to help construct the Lincoln Bypass

If Egland were elected, none of this would happen – because he would vote no – come to think of it, not Holmes, Brown or any of them could deliver any of this as a freshman back-bencher.

Hierarchy: previous, next

Comments

There are 0 comments on this post. Post yours →

Post a comment

Required fields in bold.

 
Back to Top ↩

-Legal Notice-

Any comments posted on this site are subject to the following terms, which may be changed at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not view this blog. The Placer County Republican Assembly ("PCRA") does not assume any responsibility for any comments or opinions posted on this site or any web site linked to this site. All content expressed herein is just that, expression protected by the First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech.

The opinions expressed herein are only the opinions of the author of that post/comment and may not necessarily be those of the PCRA or its Board of Directors. If you submit content or comments, you agree that the PCRA may reveal your identity and any known personal information about you to any law enforcement agency or government official in the event of legal action arising from postings or comments made by you. The PCRA at its sole discretion may edit, display, delete, transmit or distribute content posted on this site without your permission. However, the PCRA shall not be responsible for controlling or editing any content, nor can the PCRA ensure prompt removal of inappropriate or unlawful content.

You understand that blogs are furnished for entertainment and informational purposes only, and that opinions and comments expressed by its authors are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Freedom of speech is useless without freedom of thought.
- SPIRO AGNEW, speech, Dec. 3, 1969
Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such thing as Wisdom;
and no such thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech.
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, The New England Courant, Jul. 9, 1722